On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 10:51:53PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>>On (10/05/10 00:02), Rob Landley wrote:
>>> So now that NPTL is in, it sounds like the next release should be either 1.0
>>> or 1.0-pre. It is more or less feature comple
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:18:52AM +0200, Natanael Copa wrote:
>On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> wrote:
>> On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 10:51:53PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>On (10/05/10 00:02), Rob Landley wrote:
So now that NPTL is in, it sounds like the next release sho
GCC can emit prologue/epilogue code for the functions in various
different cases:
- frame pointers
- PIC build (to load ebx for indirect calls/jumps)
- forced stack smashing protection
If we used jump in such cases, we'd corrupt the call stack and
crash.
Signed-off-by: Timo Teräs
---
libm/ld
Here is a fix that I suggest for 0.9.31.
It is in folder linuxthreads.old, but I don't know if it also applies to the
"new" version.
--- a/libpthread/linuxthreads.old/errno.c 2010-04-02 11:34:27.0
-0400
+++ b/libpthread/linuxthreads.old/errno.c 2010-05-11 09:44:16.589502638
On (11/05/10 01:29), Rob Landley wrote:
> Had to switch on several more things in your config to make the native
> toolchain and busybox happy, but it built and ran. And the native toolchain
> in the system image built and ran a threaded test program (/usr/src/thread-
> hello2.c), which seemed t
> On (11/05/10 01:29), Rob Landley wrote:
> > Had to switch on several more things in your config to make the native
> > toolchain and busybox happy, but it built and ran. And the native toolchain
> > in the system image built and ran a threaded test program (/usr/src/thread-
> > hello2.c), which
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 10:30:08 Khem Raj wrote:
> On (11/05/10 01:29), Rob Landley wrote:
> > Had to switch on several more things in your config to make the native
> > toolchain and busybox happy, but it built and ran. And the native
> > toolchain in the system image built and ran a threaded test
On (11/05/10 13:07), Rob Landley wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 May 2010 10:30:08 Khem Raj wrote:
> > On (11/05/10 01:29), Rob Landley wrote:
> > > Had to switch on several more things in your config to make the native
> > > toolchain and busybox happy, but it built and ran. And the native
> > > toolchain
On 5/11/2010 5:39 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>> On (11/05/10 01:29), Rob Landley wrote:
>>> Had to switch on several more things in your config to make the native
>>> toolchain and busybox happy, but it built and ran. And the native toolchain
>>> in the system image built and ran a threaded test
