Hello,
I know of 2 problems in ldso-future:
1. I have hidden _start, some debuggers are looking for this symbol, maybe
hiding should depend on DODEBUG
2. I made skip_args static (since we do not support yet the option), but that
seems to make problems on some archs
Jocke, should we make this a
I am all for removing duplicated functions in libc/libpthread, began this in
future branch (cancellable functions), if we need separate implementations, I
would prefer to rename functions in libpthread to
show us, that this is something else...
Peter
Original-Nachricht
cd ${uclibc_srcdir}/libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/
[ -f clone.c ] || mv clone.S clone.c
[ -f vfork.c ] || mv vfork.S vfork.c
Sorry, but it was a wrong workaround. It still not build after that.
The correct one is to *never* try to use DOMULTI.
The problem (No rule to make
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 01:25:59PM +0200, Peter Mazinger wrote:
I am all for removing duplicated functions in libc/libpthread, began
this in future branch (cancellable functions), if we need separate
implementations, I would prefer to rename functions in libpthread to
show us, that this is
Hello,
within uClibc we reuse some of the functions (mostly their __GI_X
counterparts by libc_hidden_proto(). By having the cancellation
in libc, we most of the time reuse the cancellable version
Currently we dedicately define (as glibc does) where the non-cancellable
function should be used (by
