On 4/25/2011 10:02 AM, Tony Wu wrote:
Hi, Carmelo,
If commit 7b5b79f is for generic libubacktrace implementation, then, I
think TARGET_sh dependency for UCLIBC_HAS_BACKTRACE should be removed
in extra/Configs/Config.in.
Tony
You're right. Pushed in master.
Thanks,
Carmelo
On Fri,
On 4/23/2011 1:19 PM, Peter Mazinger wrote:
Hello,
Hi Peter,
I know of 2 problems in ldso-future:
1. I have hidden _start, some debuggers are looking for this symbol, maybe
hiding should depend on DODEBUG
2. I made skip_args static (since we do not support yet the option), but that
On 4/23/2011 1:16 AM, Maksim Rayskiy wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com
wrote:
On 4/20/2011 3:07 AM, Maksim Rayskiy wrote:
I built the uClibc testsuite and ran it on uClibc-0.9.32-rc3 with my
patch. There were some failures, but I do not think
On 4/24/2011 1:36 AM, Peter Mazinger wrote:
Hello,
Hi Peter,
within uClibc we reuse some of the functions (mostly their __GI_X
counterparts by libc_hidden_proto(). By having the cancellation
in libc, we most of the time reuse the cancellable version
I think that this is correct, because
