[PATCH] buildsys: fix pregen target (!NPTL with LOCALE)

2011-05-30 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
When NPTL is not enabled, and LOCALE support is used, compilation fails with the following error: - MKDIR include/bits GEN include/bits/sysnum.h make[1]: *** No rule to make target `../..//include/bits/uClibc_ctype.h',

Re: [PATCH] buildsys: fix pregen target (!NPTL with LOCALE)

2011-05-30 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 30/05/2011 14.37, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: When NPTL is not enabled, and LOCALE support is used, compilation fails with the following error: - MKDIR include/bits GEN include/bits/sysnum.h make[1]: *** No rule to

Re: [PATCH] buildsys: fix pregen target (!NPTL with LOCALE)

2011-05-30 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On May 30, 2011 2:41 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote: On 30/05/2011 14.37, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: When NPTL is not enabled, and LOCALE support is used, compilation fails with the following error: -

futimes()

2011-05-30 Thread Mark Hinds
Why isn't futimes in uClibc? I found a patch which seems to work, and there is a #if 0'd def in sys/time.h right next lutimes. I spent a few minutes searching the lists and found only the patch with little comment as to why it has not been accepted. in short, WTF? Am I missing some subtle

Re: futimes()

2011-05-30 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:09:30AM -0700, Mark Hinds wrote: Why isn't futimes in uClibc? I found a patch which seems to work, You must me using an old version. ___ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

Re: futimes()

2011-05-30 Thread Mark Hinds
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:09:30AM -0700, Mark Hinds wrote: Why isn't futimes in uClibc? I found a patch which seems to work, You must me using an old version. I don't think so. 0.9.32-rc3 seems to be the freshest thing around.