uClibc 0.9.32 failed to build for THUMB target

2011-06-13 Thread Sergei Poselenov
Hello, I tried to build the latest version for the Cortex-M3 target and got the following: ... AS libc/sysdeps/linux/arm/bsd-setjmp.o AS libc/sysdeps/linux/arm/bsd-_setjmp.o AS libc/sysdeps/linux/arm/sigrestorer.o AS libc/sysdeps/linux/arm/mmap64.o AS libc/sysdeps/linux/arm/vfork.o libc/

Re: Buildroot and bitbake

2011-06-13 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:16:48PM +0200, Laurent Bercot wrote: > Suspecting is a dangerous business. :) > > There are many, many more customers of uClibc that do not necessarily > use buildroot or OpenEmbedded. Every company that works with embedded > systems and knows what it's doing (granted,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] uClibc-0.9.32 released

2011-06-13 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 08/06/2011 22.04, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > Hi, > > We are pleased to announce the release of uClibc-0.9.32. > > Numerous bugfixes and alot of overall improvement went into this > release: > It contains NPTL (Native POSIX Thread Library) support for the following > architecures: >

Re: Buildroot and bitbake

2011-06-13 Thread Laurent Bercot
> I use uclibc as released, gcc from fsf, linux kernel from kernel.org, etc. > It isn't really that hard to do. Or maybe I am just weird. http://uclibc.org/FAQ.html#compiling #toolchain #wrapper A "standard", glibc-built gcc might work for

Re: Buildroot and bitbake

2011-06-13 Thread Rich Felker
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 08:42:31PM +0200, Laurent Bercot wrote: > > I use uclibc as released, gcc from fsf, linux kernel from kernel.org, etc. > > It isn't really that hard to do. Or maybe I am just weird. > > http://uclibc.org/FAQ.html#compiling >#toolchain >

Re: future merge

2011-06-13 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 08/06/2011 23.22, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> master is now potentially open to >> - merge future into master >> - merge prelink into master >> - merge ldso-future into master >> (in this order). >> >> To do this, ideally one

Re: Buildroot and bitbake

2011-06-13 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 08:42:31PM +0200, Laurent Bercot wrote: > > I use uclibc as released, gcc from fsf, linux kernel from kernel.org, etc. > > It isn't really that hard to do. Or maybe I am just weird. > > http://uclibc.org/FAQ.html#compiling >#toolchain >

Re: [NPTL SH4] Use arch pt-initfini.c if available

2011-06-13 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 11/06/2011 7.20, Jason Woodward wrote: > > > > ___ > uClibc mailing list > uClibc@uclibc.org > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc I'm seeing the same issue... I'll give a look. ___ uClibc ma

Re: future merge

2011-06-13 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > On 08/06/2011 23.22, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> master is now potentially open to >>> - merge future into master >>> - merge prelink into master >>> - merge ldso-f

Re: Buildroot and bitbake

2011-06-13 Thread Leon Woestenberg
Hello Ed, On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Ed W wrote: > On 11/06/2011 22:16, Laurent Bercot wrote: >>  There are many, many more customers of uClibc that do not necessarily >> use buildroot or OpenEmbedded. Every company that works with embedded >> systems and knows what it's doing (granted, tha

Re: Buildroot and bitbake

2011-06-13 Thread Steve Bennett
On 14/06/2011, at 4:55 AM, Rich Felker wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 08:42:31PM +0200, Laurent Bercot wrote: >>> I use uclibc as released, gcc from fsf, linux kernel from kernel.org, etc. >>> It isn't really that hard to do. Or maybe I am just weird. >> >> http://uclibc.org/FAQ.html#compiling