Re: Do I need modify newlib code for endian changed?

2011-07-27 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 24/07/2011 1.22, Liu wrote: Hi all, We've changed a CPU into little-endian from big-endian, and binutils and gcc have been rewrite for little-endian. Do I need modify newlib code for endian changed? If I do need, what should I do? Thanks --Liu Hi, uCLibc is not newlib... likely

Re: Toolchain test suite

2011-07-27 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 25/07/2011 3.23, manish kumar wrote: Hi, Is there any official test suite to verify the stability of tool-chain, specifically uClibc based? And is this official test suite maintained by community as well? I am looking for maximum coverage of tool-chain functionality and not just uClibc

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ldso/mips: Clean up warnings

2011-07-27 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 24/07/2011 10.19, Kevin Cernekee wrote: Trivial fixes for these warnings: CC ldso/libdl/libdl.oS In file included from ldso/ldso/ldso.c:46:0: ldso/ldso/mips/elfinterp.c:88:1: warning: no previous prototype for '__dl_runtime_pltresolve' ldso/ldso/ldso.c: In function

Re: Do I need modify uClibc code for endian changed?

2011-07-27 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Liu pro...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, We've changed a CPU into little-endian from big-endian, and binutils and gcc have been rewrite for little-endian. Do I need modify uClibc code for endian changed? If I do need, what should I do? set ARCH_LITTLE_ENDIAN=y

Re: Do I need modify uClibc code for endian changed?

2011-07-27 Thread Liu
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Liu pro...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, We've changed a CPU into little-endian from big-endian, and binutils and gcc have been rewrite for little-endian. Do I need modify uClibc code for endian

Re: Toolchain test suite

2011-07-27 Thread Rob Landley
On 07/24/2011 08:23 PM, manish kumar wrote: Hi, Is there any official test suite to verify the stability of tool-chain, specifically uClibc based? And is this official test suite maintained by community as well? I am looking for maximum coverage of tool-chain functionality and not just

Cross-compiling C++ for the ICnova AP7000 base (AVR32) - unresolved references

2011-07-27 Thread higgins-demack
Cross-compiling myprog.cpp (under Ubuntu with a buildroot toolchain) with avr32-linux-g++ produces a bunch of undefined references as shown below. I know it's something to do with libraries in the toolchain, but I can't track it down. Which buildroot options should I fiddle with?

Re: Cross-compiling C++ for the ICnova AP7000 base (AVR32) - unresolved references

2011-07-27 Thread WANG.Jiong
It seems your uClibc has not enabled the following feature UCLIBC_HAS_WCHAR UCLIBC_HAS_LOCALE UCLIBC_HAS_XLOCALE suggest you to check your libc with avr32-linux-nm to see if these function's avaiable if not, then check uClibc config file to make sure those feature macro has been set On