Hi Thomas,
I am building for another target(i have a x86 based board).
Yes as you suggested i have done chroot,
shellchroot /path/to/buildroot/output/target /bin/sh
and able to use the new root file system of build root. but now the question is
my toolchain binaries like
Hello,
Please don't top-post. See
http://linux.sgms-centre.com/misc/netiquette.php#toppost
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Mahanteshwari Hiremath
mahanteshwari.hirem...@lnties.com wrote:
[..]
I see it is over riding my native toll commands.
suggest me how can i safely set this LD_LIBRARY_PATH,
On 3 November 2011 14:23, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
It appears that the abort() function somehow breaks the resulting
corefile so that you can't do a post-mortem backtrace. I suspect that
gcc has figured out that the abort() function never returns, so it
doesn't push a
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 08:43:59PM +0100, j...@eclis.ch wrote:
From: Jean-Christian de Rivaz j...@eclis.ch
Applied, thanks!
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 07:18:48PM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
We already provide sincos() on some archs, so we should ship a generic version.
Applied, thanks!
(IIRC you should potentially end up with the gcc builtin anyway, don't
you?)
___
uClibc
Hi,
We are implementing uclibc port for CR16 target with shared library
support. However, there was an issue observed during testing the port
with shared library.
The following link was referred to compile the applications with static
and shared libraries:-
On 3 November 2011 09:31, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
On several architectures __NR_ulimit syscall number is currently
defined but it is remapped onto sys_ni_syscall, while on other
architectures they are not longer defined.
So use {get,set}rlimit only to implement ulimit
Hi,
The original message attachment has been quarantined.
Hence please find the attached command file
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
Hi,
The original message attachment has been quarantined.
Hence please find the attached command file command.txt.
Thanks Regards,
Naveen
rm -f test_shared_flat libmy_lib.a libmy_lib_so lib3.so *.elf *.o *.gdb
cr16-uclinux-gcc -c -mint32 -mcr16cplus -mdata-model=far -O2
-mid-shared-library
On 2011-11-04, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 November 2011 14:23, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
It appears that the abort() function somehow breaks the resulting
corefile so that you can't do a post-mortem backtrace. ?I suspect that
gcc has figured
On 04/11/2011 13.50, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On 3 November 2011 09:31, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
On several architectures __NR_ulimit syscall number is currently
defined but it is remapped onto sys_ni_syscall, while on other
architectures they are not longer
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 03:08:25AM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2011-11-04, Rich Felker dal...@aerifal.cx wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 01:23:30PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
It appears that the abort() function somehow breaks the resulting
corefile so that you can't do a post-mortem
12 matches
Mail list logo