Support for CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW

2012-04-11 Thread Richard Braun
Hello, Is there a particular reason why CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW isn't defined in libc/sysdeps/linux/common/bits/time.h ? -- Richard Braun ___ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

Re: Support for CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW

2012-04-11 Thread Rich Felker
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 01:36:17PM +0200, Richard Braun wrote: Hello, Is there a particular reason why CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW isn't defined in libc/sysdeps/linux/common/bits/time.h ? This is something of an aside, but I'd be really interested in knowing what it's needed for. A number of folks

Re: Support for CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW

2012-04-11 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 11 April 2012 07:36:17 Richard Braun wrote: Is there a particular reason why CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW isn't defined in libc/sysdeps/linux/common/bits/time.h ? headers generally get synced with glibc when someone notices + posts a patch -mike signature.asc Description: This is a

Re: Support for CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW

2012-04-11 Thread Richard Braun
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:17:01AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: This is something of an aside, but I'd be really interested in knowing what it's needed for. A number of folks go around asserting that CLOCK_MONOTONIC is not really monotonic on Linux, but according to the documentation it is

[ANNOUNCE] uClibc-0.9.33.1 released

2012-04-11 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Hello all, The uClibc team is happy to announce the maintenance-release of uClibc-0.9.33.1. You can grab the current uClibc release from our download-page at http://uclibc.org/downloads/ specifically http://uclibc.org/downloads/uClibc-0.9.33.1.tar.xz If you find bugs, please do not hesitate to

Re: Horrible GCC 4.7.0 optimizer bug

2012-04-11 Thread Sedat Dilek
Just FYI: The Freetz project had success with a backport of the tentative patch attached to GCC bug #52734 on MIPS. - Sedat - [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52734 On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Michael Deutschmann mich...@talamasca.ocis.net wrote: Thought I should give you

[ANNOUNCE] uClibc++-0.2.3 released

2012-04-11 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Hi, The uClibc team is happy to announce the maintenance-release of uClibc++-0.2.3 By popular request, a new release is out now, including a few compatibility tweaks we have accumulated since the last release. The release can be obtained from the download area of http://cxx.uclibc.org/ Fixes

Re: [ANNOUNCE] uClibc-0.9.33.1 released

2012-04-11 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:19:47PM +0200, Piotr Gluszenia Slawinski wrote: On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: Hello all, The uClibc team is happy to announce the maintenance-release of uClibc-0.9.33.1. not sure if anyone responsible is on the list but... will there be release

Re: [ANNOUNCE] uClibc-0.9.33.1 released

2012-04-11 Thread Piotr Gluszenia Slawinski
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: Hello all, The uClibc team is happy to announce the maintenance-release of uClibc-0.9.33.1. not sure if anyone responsible is on the list but... will there be release for gentoo? -- ___ uClibc

Re: [ANNOUNCE] uClibc-0.9.33.1 released

2012-04-11 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 11 April 2012 15:31:20 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:19:47PM +0200, Piotr Gluszenia Slawinski wrote: On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: Hello all, The uClibc team is happy to announce the maintenance-release of uClibc-0.9.33.1.