Re: O_NOFOLLOW is not a gnu extension, it's posix-2008.

2013-03-13 Thread Rich Felker
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 09:57:37PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > Files like libc/sysdeps/linux/powerpc/bits/fcntl.h have blobs like: > > #ifdef __USE_GNU > # define O_DIRECT 040 /* Direct disk access. */ > # define O_DIRECTORY 04 /* Must be a directory. */ > # define O_NOFOLLOW

Questions on .config [uClibc for ARM Cortex A9]

2013-03-13 Thread Ramesh Rangavittal
Hello, I am trying to build uClibc for ARM Cortex A9 processor. For the version uClibc-0.9.30.1 & powerpc e500, I see the below config options set in a .config found a different email thread. CONFIG_E500=y TARGET_SUBARCH="e500" For the A9, I ran into the below email thread, I am not sure wh

Re: Next release of uclibc

2013-03-13 Thread Florian Fainelli
Hello Bernhard, On 01/08/2013 09:51 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On 6 January 2013 16:10:41 "Anthony G. Basile" wrote: Hi everyone, Is there a schedule for the next release of uclibc. I hit an issue with glib, traced it back to eventfd and noticed that a fix was already in the repo, b

Re: uClibc usable for non-linux apps?

2013-03-13 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:47:48AM +0100, stl wrote: > Hello all, > I would like to replace newlib with uClibc in my cross compiler. > But I am wondering if it is feasible for a non-linux application.. > > I already have compiled a linux cross-compiler, but I would like to use it > to run any appl

Re: [PATCH 3/7] leek: if lseek syscall is not available, use lseek64 even for !LFS

2013-03-13 Thread Vineet Gupta
On Tuesday 12 March 2013 08:39 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On 11 March 2013 13:21, Vineet Gupta wrote: >> + __off64_t result; >> + __off_t high = 0; >> + return INLINE_SYSCALL(llseek, 5, fd, >> + __LONG_LONG_PAIR(high, offset), >> +