On 04/02/2013 02:43 PM, Will Newton wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Pirmin Walthert wrote:
That's ok for me (as the most important thing is not to have a regression in
the next release) but in fact the first of the following patches would have
been enough to fix the bug. However the se
From: root
This fixes a potential memory leak in case of "m" modifier set
and (sc.width > 0).
Signed-off-by: Pirmin Walthert
---
libc/stdio/_scanf.c |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libc/stdio/_scanf.c b/libc/stdio/_scanf.c
index fe33386..a7592b6 10064
From: root
Fixes a bug introduced with e567c399ff86d007d8c4586f0dd5e0ca61e283ca.
As "i" is already used in a different loop, it needs to be reset.
Signed-off-by: Pirmin Walthert
---
libc/stdio/_scanf.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/libc/stdio/_scanf.c b/libc/stdio/_sca
