Commit aab4df0fb51660300559f5f29290709db2f7bfee says that the line with
after res_init() function. Commit
7f74de5d4d6d10baafab4b37bb3d472f5c5f0e8c moves the res_init()
function below the line with #undef _res.
This commit moves res_init() back above #undef _res.
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Soerensen
From c34c95553ac7ebd278059fada06319aaf132c906 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kenneth Soerensen kenneth.soren...@spectralink.com
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:52:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Make res_init() thread safe.
res_init() was not atomic, which could give undesired behaviour. Now
res_init()
From 2c80f5fa6cb55ed5b69e2bd74c921af618027015 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kenneth Soerensen kenneth.soren...@spectralink.com
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:10:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] Fix lookup with DNS search domains when res_init() is
used in multi-threaded application.
In a
As Will noticed, the header this check is currently done in
is asm-only, and is not meant to be included from C code.
This breaks compilation when compiled for a Thumb2-aware CPU.
Move the BX check to its own header, and revert 7a246fd.
Reported-by: Will Newton will.new...@gmail.com
Hello All!
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:02:03PM +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
As Will noticed, the header this check is currently done in
is asm-only, and is not meant to be included from C code.
This breaks compilation when compiled for a Thumb2-aware CPU.
Move the BX check to its own header,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Yann E. MORIN yann.morin.1...@free.fr wrote:
Hi Yann,
Hello All!
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:02:03PM +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
As Will noticed, the header this check is currently done in
is asm-only, and is not meant to be included from C code.
This
Will, All,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:18:12PM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Yann E. MORIN yann.morin.1...@free.fr
wrote:
I was not able to build a libc, due to assembler error messages,
that were present even before this patch.
Which errors did you see? I
