On 7 May 2013 07:32:20 Vineet Gupta <vineet.gup...@synopsys.com> wrote:
On 05/07/2013 10:02 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On May 6, 2013, at 9:10 PM, Vineet Gupta <vineet.gup...@synopsys.com> wrote:
>
>>> This attribute_hidden should not be resurrected.
>> Is this because uClibc convention is to specify this only with
prototypes which is
>> already being done.
> is it possible to rename the conflicting functions in busy box?
I suppose we could - but the hidden proto for these still has value in that PLT
can be avoided for calls within uClibc.
uClibc copied the config parser from Busybox, not the other way round. I
initially did not rename them to ease syncing back from Busybox.
-Vineet
Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
