On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:31:53AM +0200, Filippo ARCIDIACONO wrote:
> At least on ARM, building the ld.so with -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
> for backtrace is creating a dependencies against libc through libgcc_eh.
> So it needs to exclude this from the ldso cflags.
Have you figured out why this
Hello,
2013/9/13 Filippo ARCIDIACONO :
> Currently the Makefile rules are not removing from the global CFLAGS
> any of the OMIT cflags declared at file level. This patch fixes it.
Do we really need to have two different ways of achieving the same
thing? It seems to me that doing:
CFLAGS_foo.c +=
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:31:53AM +0200, Filippo ARCIDIACONO wrote:
> > At least on ARM, building the ld.so with -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
> > for backtrace is creating a dependencies against libc through libgcc_eh.
> > So it needs to exclude this from
Hi Florian
Il 17 settembre 2013 17:57:00 Florian Fainelli ha
scritto:
Hello,
2013/9/13 Filippo ARCIDIACONO :
> Currently the Makefile rules are not removing from the global CFLAGS
> any of the OMIT cflags declared at file level. This patch fixes it.
Do we really need to have two different wa
Dear uClibc developers,
The last release of uClibc, 0.9.33.2, has been made well over a year
ago. However, there is fairly big number of improvements/fixes in the
master branch that would be interesting to have in a release. At the
Buildroot level, we now have 53 patches in your patch stack agains
Il 18 settembre 2013 06:49:44 Thomas Petazzoni
ha scritto:
Dear uClibc developers,
Hi Thomas
The last release of uClibc, 0.9.33.2, has been made well over a year
ago. However, there is fairly big number of improvements/fixes in the
master branch that would be interesting to have in a rel
