On 07/28/2016 03:04 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>> Indeed your 2/2 seems to be the most "past-proof" code change. So I
>> >would think it
>> >is indeed better and is something I should have done in the first
>> >place.
>> >
>> >@Alexey, @Vlad what say you ?
> uClibc traditionally supports t
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Burgess wrote,
> Some old versions of binutils did not support @pcl relocations. This
> commit adds a new flag to the uClibc configuration system that detects
> if the toolchain supports @pcl relocations or not.
>
> If this relocation is supported then the define ARC_HAS_AT_PCL
On July 28, 2016 8:50:41 PM GMT+02:00, Vineet Gupta
wrote:
>Hi Andrew,
>
>On 07/28/2016 11:20 AM, Andrew Burgess wrote:
>> This is a slightly odd series of 2 patches. The two patches are
>> actually alternative solutions to the same problem. I'm keen to see
>> one of these merged, but I don't k
Hi Andrew,
On 07/28/2016 11:20 AM, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> This is a slightly odd series of 2 patches. The two patches are
> actually alternative solutions to the same problem. I'm keen to see
> one of these merged, but I don't know which method would be preferred.
>
> This commit aims to addres
This commit reverses a change introduced in commit 20554a78a9bba that
split some of the ARC code into two based on whether uClibc was
configured with native threads or not.
The native thread code was updated to use the relocation syntax of
modern binutils, while the non-native code path used a syn
Some old versions of binutils did not support @pcl relocations. This
commit adds a new flag to the uClibc configuration system that detects
if the toolchain supports @pcl relocations or not.
If this relocation is supported then the define ARC_HAS_AT_PCL_RELOC
will be passed to the compiler, which
This is a slightly odd series of 2 patches. The two patches are
actually alternative solutions to the same problem. I'm keen to see
one of these merged, but I don't know which method would be preferred.
This commit aims to address an issue that was introduced / mentioned
in commit 20554a78a9bba2
I ran into this issue while trying to debug a _different_ issue witin
the uClinc(-ng) arc dynamic linker. I turned on debugging support
within the dynamic linker, and the linker would no longer complete its
bootstrap phase due to a lack of support for the R_ARC_JMP_SLOT
relocation type.
To reprod
