Re: NPTL Support for ppc?

2009-11-05 Thread Fathi Boudra
Does buildroot/uClibc currently support NPTL? No, see this thread: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/uclibc/2009-March/042221.html cheers, Fathi ___ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

Re: pthreads stress test hangs on read() returning EINTR

2008-10-06 Thread Fathi Boudra
Hi, ping. Any comments from people who care about thread ? As a reminder: - http://busybox.net/bugs/view.php?id=4994 - http://uclibc.org/lists/uclibc/2008-March/019187.html It could be nice to take a look before 0.9.30 release. cheers, Fathi ___

Re: [PATCH] posix_favise{64} error handling fixes [was Re: fadvise gclibc vs uclibc]

2008-09-24 Thread Fathi Boudra
Carmelo, I was finally able to test this today. The tests are still failing for me (I'm on ppc32), though for different reasons than before :-) . I have not tried the ppc workaround patch yet, though. I'll let you know. Is it the lseek issue ? ___

Re: [PATCH] posix_favise{64} error handling fixes [was Re: fadvise gclibc vs uclibc]

2008-09-24 Thread Fathi Boudra
Carmelo, I was finally able to test this today. The tests are still failing for me (I'm on ppc32), though for different reasons than before :-) . I have not tried the ppc workaround patch yet, though. I'll let you know. Is it the lseek issue ? fork10.c:66: error: conflicting types for

Re: [PATCH] posix_favise{64} error handling fixes [was Re: fadvise gclibc vs uclibc]

2008-09-19 Thread Fathi Boudra
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 03:29:09PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: Absolutely agreed. IIRC I should now use __inline__ keyword, right? yes. Merged. Thanks for review ;-) fails to

Re: [PATCH] posix_favise{64} error handling fixes [was Re: fadvise gclibc vs uclibc]

2008-09-19 Thread Fathi Boudra
fails to build on my config. LD libuClibc-0.9.29.so http://libuClibc-0.9.29.so libc/libc_so.a(posix_fadvise64.os): In function `posix_fadvise64': posix_fadvise64.c:(.text+0x18): undefined reference to `__illegally_sized_syscall_arg2' posix_fadvise64.c:(.text+0x1c): undefined reference to

Re: [PATCH] posix_favise{64} error handling fixes [was Re: fadvise gclibc vs uclibc]

2008-09-19 Thread Fathi Boudra
powerpc needs a specific implementation because it expects 8 bytes long variable. Look recent messages, as I said, regarding pread_wirte implementation. I found a related patch submitted by wade berrier and commited by bernhard:

Re: [Buildroot] Add libcap/elfutils/systemtap to buildroot

2008-06-29 Thread Fathi Boudra
On Saturday 28 June 2008 22:11:23 Fathi Boudra wrote: Now, I have another failure: argp.h not found. AFAICS, it is glibc specific and again, uClibc doesn't provide it. I guess the way to go is argp-standalone ? Well, using argp-standalone fixed this issue. new failure: fts.h not found. Same

Re: [Buildroot] Add libcap/elfutils/systemtap to buildroot

2008-06-28 Thread Fathi Boudra
reply to myself and cc'ed to uclibc ml. On Thursday 19 June 2008 08:04:49 Fathi Boudra wrote: did someone tried to cross-build systemtap and his dependencies on buildroot/uclibc ? So far, I have libcap but fail on building elfutils. my 1st issue with elfutils is fixed: it is related to uClibc