On Thursday 30 October 2008 00:01:54 Vladimir Dronnikov wrote:
let the next nightly snapshot overwrite it?
I think that's it. No need to keep volatile stuff until a release is done.
Ok.
On mini-native/system-image:
As you know I want to link all things statically. But the presence of
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 06:25:12PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
Would you prefer I keep a snapshot of the -rc3 toolchains and system images
around (which is what's currently in http://uclibc.org/~landley/fwl ) or let
the next nightly snapshot overwrite it? (Do you have an
opinion either way?)
I
Kevin Day wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
uClibc-0.9.30-rc3 is out of the door. Please refer to
$ svn log -r23683:23835 svn://uClibc.org/trunk/uClibc
for the ChangeLog between the -rc2 and -rc3.
The tarballs can be downloaded
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 08:07:18AM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Kevin Day wrote:
Is there a reason the following:
http://uclibc.org/lists/uclibc/2008-May/019349.html
was not fixed in this version?
may be lack of time for reviewing and testing ?
I seem to remember a cleaned up version of
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 15:31:22 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
Hi,
uClibc-0.9.30-rc3 is out of the door. Please refer to
$ svn log -r23683:23835 svn://uClibc.org/trunk/uClibc
for the ChangeLog between the -rc2 and -rc3.
The tarballs can be downloaded -- as usual -- from
let the next nightly snapshot overwrite it?
I think that's it. No need to keep volatile stuff until a release is done.
On mini-native/system-image:
As you know I want to link all things statically. But the presence of *.so*
in /lib prevent some broken packages from respecting even magnum
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
uClibc-0.9.30-rc3 is out of the door. Please refer to
$ svn log -r23683:23835 svn://uClibc.org/trunk/uClibc
for the ChangeLog between the -rc2 and -rc3.
The tarballs can be downloaded -- as usual -- from
