On Friday 10 July 2009 13:43:24 Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 06:24:54PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 06 July 2009 10:40:35 Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 06:28:32PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > On Friday 03 July 2009 16:50:22 Mike Fr
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 06:24:54PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 06 July 2009 10:40:35 Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 06:28:32PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Friday 03 July 2009 16:50:22 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > Unify all the common syscall defines in s
On Monday 06 July 2009 10:40:35 Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 06:28:32PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Friday 03 July 2009 16:50:22 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > Unify all the common syscall defines in syscalls-common.h and scrub all
> > > the duplicated code from relevant p
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 July 2009 18:09:23 John Williams wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 07 July 2009 08:10:04 Michal Simek wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> that leaves us with this arch list that need to get updated:
>
On Tuesday 07 July 2009 18:09:23 John Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 07 July 2009 08:10:04 Michal Simek wrote:
> >> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> > that leaves us with this arch list that need to get updated:
> >> > alpha/bits/syscalls.h
On Tuesday 07 July 2009 08:10:04 Michal Simek wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > that leaves us with this arch list that need to get updated:
> > alpha/bits/syscalls.h
> > e1/bits/syscalls.h
> > frv/bits/syscalls.h
> > h8300/bits/syscalls.h
> > i960/bits/sysc
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 03 July 2009 16:50:22 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> Unify all the common syscall defines in syscalls-common.h and scrub all
>> the duplicated code from relevant ports. This should also make converting
>> existing ports to INLINE_SYSCALL() much easier as they don't have
On Monday 06 July 2009 16:26:50 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 06 July 2009 13:26:25 Austin Foxley wrote:
> > On 07/05/2009 03:28 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > Austin: can you please commit your sparc implementation fix to the
> > > master branch ?
> >
> > Committed. Sparc now defines INTERNAL
On Monday 06 July 2009 13:26:25 Austin Foxley wrote:
> On 07/05/2009 03:28 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > Austin: can you please commit your sparc implementation fix to the master
> > branch ?
>
> Committed. Sparc now defines INTERNAL_SYSCALL and INLINE_SYSCALL in
> anticipation of your patch.
ok,
On 07/05/2009 03:28 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> Austin: can you please commit your sparc implementation fix to the master
> branch ?
Committed. Sparc now defines INTERNAL_SYSCALL and INLINE_SYSCALL in
anticipation of your patch.
-Austin
___
uClibc mai
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 06:28:32PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 03 July 2009 16:50:22 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > Unify all the common syscall defines in syscalls-common.h and scrub all
> > the duplicated code from relevant ports. This should also make converting
> > existing ports to IN
On Friday 03 July 2009 16:50:22 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> Unify all the common syscall defines in syscalls-common.h and scrub all
> the duplicated code from relevant ports. This should also make converting
> existing ports to INLINE_SYSCALL() much easier as they don't have to get
> lost in all the u
Unify all the common syscall defines in syscalls-common.h and scrub all
the duplicated code from relevant ports. This should also make converting
existing ports to INLINE_SYSCALL() much easier as they don't have to get
lost in all the unrelated noise, as well as creating new ports.
Signed-off-by:
13 matches
Mail list logo
