On Sunday 30 August 2009 03:33:53 Khem Raj wrote:
+#if defined __UCLIBC_HAS_LFS__ (!defined __NR_fadvise64_64 || !defined
_syscall6)
no code should be checking for _syscall6 existence anymore. if an arch doesnt
support it, it is broken and that is that. we arent catering to these broken
The syscall is having different number of params
and in one case the parameters are passed in differently.
This patch add powerpc specific versions of these
functions.
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
---
libc/sysdeps/linux/powerpc/posix_fadvise.c | 36 +
On (30/08/09 00:33), Khem Raj wrote:
The syscall is having different number of params
and in one case the parameters are passed in differently.
This patch add powerpc specific versions of these
functions.
Actually didnt notice that I sent a wrong patch. Here is the one I
should have sent
Thx
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 01:05:16AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On (30/08/09 00:33), Khem Raj wrote:
The syscall is having different number of params
and in one case the parameters are passed in differently.
This patch add powerpc specific versions of these
functions.
Actually didnt notice that I
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 6:00 AM, Bernhard
Reutner-Fischerrep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 01:05:16AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On (30/08/09 00:33), Khem Raj wrote:
The syscall is having different number of params
and in one case the parameters are passed in differently.
This
