On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 04:56:49PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:02:33AM +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 09:50:21AM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>>>
>>>
>> This doesn't happen on nptl branch that does
Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:02:33AM +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 09:50:21AM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>>
>>
> This doesn't happen on nptl branch that doesn' t include recent
> chanegs on build system !
>
>
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 04:26:58PM +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:02:33AM +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>>On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 09:50:21AM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>>
> This doesn't happen on nptl branch that doesn' t include recent
> chanegs on build s
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:02:33AM +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 09:50:21AM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>
This doesn't happen on nptl branch that doesn' t include recent
chanegs on build system !
>>>
>>> Do you also see this without -C ?
>>>
>> N
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 09:50:21AM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 09:28:07AM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I don't have this problem... instead I'm seeing the the ld.so is
>>> linked
>>
>> You have to turn on domulti to
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 09:50:21AM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>>> This doesn't happen on nptl branch that doesn' t include recent
>>> chanegs on build system !
>>>
>>
>> Do you also see this without -C ?
>>
> No, without -C it works fine as below
Great. I didn't think about -C. I'll
Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 09:28:07AM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>> I don't have this problem... instead I'm seeing the the ld.so is linked
>>
>
> You have to turn on domulti to see it.
>
>
I'll try it.
>> twice
>> as below
>>
>
> odd. I'll hav
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 09:28:07AM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> Hi,
> I don't have this problem... instead I'm seeing the the ld.so is linked
You have to turn on domulti to see it.
> twice
> as below
odd. I'll have a look.
> This doesn't happen on nptl branch that doesn' t include recent
Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> [I've already sent this some time ago and got no response]
> Hi,
>
> LD libuClibc-0.9.29.so
> ./lib/interp.os:(.interp+0x0): multiple definition of `__dl_ldso__'
> lib/interp.os:(.interp+0x0): first defined here
>
> - interp comes in via LIBs, remove erroneous duplicate
[I've already sent this some time ago and got no response]
Hi,
LD libuClibc-0.9.29.so
./lib/interp.os:(.interp+0x0): multiple definition of `__dl_ldso__'
lib/interp.os:(.interp+0x0): first defined here
- interp comes in via LIBs, remove erroneous duplicate prerequisite.
I will apply this patch
10 matches
Mail list logo