Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
> Hello,
> any concerns on this changes ?
>
merged ;-)
Carmelo
> 2008/6/11 Carmelo AMOROSO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 11 June 2008 11:00, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>>>
Hi,
I've found some problem while building bluez-utils for ucli
Hello,
any concerns on this changes ?
2008/6/11 Carmelo AMOROSO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>> On Wednesday 11 June 2008 11:00, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I've found some problem while building bluez-utils for uclibc due to
>>> missing
>>> ENOKEY errno, that is properly
Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 June 2008 11:00, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I've found some problem while building bluez-utils for uclibc due to
>> missing
>> ENOKEY errno, that is properly defined in linux/asm-generic/errno.h
>> that uclibc doesn't include from include/bits/err
On Wednesday 11 June 2008 11:00, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> Hi,
> I've found some problem while building bluez-utils for uclibc due to
> missing
> ENOKEY errno, that is properly defined in linux/asm-generic/errno.h
> that uclibc doesn't include from include/bits/errno.h.
> We use instead bits/errno_
Hi,
I've found some problem while building bluez-utils for uclibc due to
missing
ENOKEY errno, that is properly defined in linux/asm-generic/errno.h
that uclibc doesn't include from include/bits/errno.h.
We use instead bits/errno_values.h.
I think it should be worth to be always aligned with er