Re: [PATCH] update bits/errno.h to include kernel header errno.h instead of errno_values.h

Carmelo Amoroso wrote: > Hello, > any concerns on this changes ? > merged ;-) Carmelo > 2008/6/11 Carmelo AMOROSO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Denys Vlasenko wrote: >>> On Wednesday 11 June 2008 11:00, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: >>> Hi, I've found some problem while building bluez-utils for ucli

Re: [PATCH] update bits/errno.h to include kernel header errno.h instead of errno_values.h

Hello, any concerns on this changes ? 2008/6/11 Carmelo AMOROSO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Denys Vlasenko wrote: >> On Wednesday 11 June 2008 11:00, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> I've found some problem while building bluez-utils for uclibc due to >>> missing >>> ENOKEY errno, that is properly

Re: [PATCH] update bits/errno.h to include kernel header errno.h instead of errno_values.h

Denys Vlasenko wrote: > On Wednesday 11 June 2008 11:00, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > >> Hi, >> I've found some problem while building bluez-utils for uclibc due to >> missing >> ENOKEY errno, that is properly defined in linux/asm-generic/errno.h >> that uclibc doesn't include from include/bits/err

Re: [PATCH] update bits/errno.h to include kernel header errno.h instead of errno_values.h

On Wednesday 11 June 2008 11:00, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > Hi, > I've found some problem while building bluez-utils for uclibc due to > missing > ENOKEY errno, that is properly defined in linux/asm-generic/errno.h > that uclibc doesn't include from include/bits/errno.h. > We use instead bits/errno_

[PATCH] update bits/errno.h to include kernel header errno.h instead of errno_values.h

Hi, I've found some problem while building bluez-utils for uclibc due to missing ENOKEY errno, that is properly defined in linux/asm-generic/errno.h that uclibc doesn't include from include/bits/errno.h. We use instead bits/errno_values.h. I think it should be worth to be always aligned with er