On 14/10/2011 15.39, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
On 14/10/2011 14.50, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 02:55:29PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Hello,
I'm having some problem in building now NPTL without RESOLVER.
I've fixed one of this problem (not yet pushed), but other
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 02:55:29PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Hello,
I'm having some problem in building now NPTL without RESOLVER.
I've fixed one of this problem (not yet pushed), but other appeared
(basically __resp variable is not longer visible).
So for now, NPTL requires RESOLVER.
I'll
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
Sorry if I'm late with comments, but why we are adding this support into
libc, instead of in libresolv (currently an empty stub) ?
This was discussed in length, dig in the archives if you're curious
about the
On 26/08/2011 9.52, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:54:32AM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 18, 2011 10:03 AM, Daniel Mack zon...@gmail.com wrote:
Any opinions about this patch
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm having some problem in building now NPTL without RESOLVER.
I've fixed one of this problem (not yet pushed), but other appeared
(basically __resp variable is not longer visible).
So for now, NPTL requires
On 26/08/2011 15.02, Daniel Mack wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com
wrote:
Hello,
I'm having some problem in building now NPTL without RESOLVER.
I've fixed one of this problem (not yet pushed), but other appeared
(basically __resp variable is not
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 18, 2011 10:03 AM, Daniel Mack zon...@gmail.com wrote:
Any opinions about this patch set, anyone?
Looks good, I will apply it asap.
Thanks!
Apperantly, this didn't happen yet?
I'd also appreciate
