On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:47:50 +0100
Hans-Christian Egtvedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AFAIK we will keep this value, as it is chosen by a third party compiler
> vendor (IAR). This was done before my time, so perhaps Haavard can shed
> some light on it?
You're right that it was initially used by
On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 02:51 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 November 2007, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
> > +#define EM_AVR32 0x18ad
>
> you guys arent in binutils yet eh ? you planning on keeping this value, or
> you going to be dropping down to a normal one ?
>
We are not
On Tuesday 06 November 2007, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
> +#define EM_AVR32 0x18ad
you guys arent in binutils yet eh ? you planning on keeping this value, or
you going to be dropping down to a normal one ?
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_
This patch adds the AVR32 specific headers.
Signed-off-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/include/elf.h b/include/elf.h
index 19805d7..ab90160 100644
--- a/include/elf.h
+++ b/include/elf.h
@@ -354,6 +354,8 @@ typedef struct
/* NIOS magic number - no EABI available.
