On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:31:53AM +0200, Filippo ARCIDIACONO wrote:
At least on ARM, building the ld.so with -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
for backtrace is creating a dependencies against libc through libgcc_eh.
So it needs to exclude this from the ldso cflags.
Have you figured out why this is
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013, Rich Felker wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:31:53AM +0200, Filippo ARCIDIACONO wrote:
At least on ARM, building the ld.so with -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
for backtrace is creating a dependencies against libc through libgcc_eh.
So it needs to exclude this from the
Of
Filippo ARCIDIACONO
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 4:32 AM
To: uclibc@uclibc.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ldso: exclude -fasynchronous-unwind-tables from ldso CFLAGS
At least on ARM, building the ld.so with -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
for backtrace is creating a dependencies against libc through
At least on ARM, building the ld.so with -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
for backtrace is creating a dependencies against libc through libgcc_eh.
So it needs to exclude this from the ldso cflags.
Signed-off-by: Carmelo Amoroso carmelo.amor...@st.com
Signed-off-by: Filippo Arcidiacono
@uclibc.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ldso: exclude -fasynchronous-unwind-tables from ldso CFLAGS
At least on ARM, building the ld.so with -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
for backtrace is creating a dependencies against libc through libgcc_eh.
So it needs to exclude this from the ldso cflags.
Signed-off
