On 26 November 2012 21:27, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 20:21 +, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> That's weird. It makes me wonder how come C6X is supported in uClibc
>> without the deprecated syscalls. I will have a look
>
> The upstream kernel requires a patched uClibc.
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 20:21 +, Markos Chandras wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> That's weird. It makes me wonder how come C6X is supported in uClibc
> without the deprecated syscalls. I will have a look
The upstream kernel requires a patched uClibc. The original c6x support
which went into uClibc was ba
On 26 November 2012 19:37, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 14:24 +, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> diff --git a/extra/Configs/Config.c6x b/extra/Configs/Config.c6x
>> index 96adfb3..cc8d647 100644
>> --- a/extra/Configs/Config.c6x
>> +++ b/extra/Configs/Config.c6x
>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ co
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 14:24 +, Markos Chandras wrote:
> diff --git a/extra/Configs/Config.c6x b/extra/Configs/Config.c6x
> index 96adfb3..cc8d647 100644
> --- a/extra/Configs/Config.c6x
> +++ b/extra/Configs/Config.c6x
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ config FORCE_OPTIONS_FOR_ARCH
> default y
>
From: Markos Chandras
Linuxthreads(old and new) need deprecated syscalls to build. Existing
architectures support these system calls but new architectures don't.
This symbol has no functional change apart from hidding the Linuxthreads
symbols from arches that don't support them.
Signed-off-by: M
