On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 07:00:55AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 15:28:04 Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 22 July 2009 10:49:00 Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
As described in thread
Hi Maxim,
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 06:49:00PM +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Hello,
As described in thread
http://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/uclibc/2009-July/042670.html,
uClibc build is currently broken on m68k. The attached patch ports
slightly OT, but you seem to have an m68k box..
I once
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 15:28:04 Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 22 July 2009 10:49:00 Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
As described in thread
http://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/uclibc/2009-July/042670.html, uClibc
build is currently broken on m68k.
Hi Maxim,
I've added a couple of tweaks (removed syscall.c) to your patch and verified
that it builds on m68k. I didn't do runtime testing at this point, but I
will sometime later.
FWIW, I eyeballed the patch and the common code and didn't spot any
problems. Do you necessarily need
Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 22 July 2009 10:49:00 Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
As described in thread
http://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/uclibc/2009-July/042670.html, uClibc
build is currently broken on m68k. The attached patch ports relevant
pieces of syscall handling
Hello,
As described in thread
http://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/uclibc/2009-July/042670.html, uClibc
build is currently broken on m68k. The attached patch ports relevant
pieces of syscall handling from recent GLIBC thus fixing the problem.
Any comments?
Thanks,
--
Maxim K.
CodeSourcery
On Wednesday 22 July 2009 10:49:00 Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
As described in thread
http://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/uclibc/2009-July/042670.html, uClibc
build is currently broken on m68k. The attached patch ports relevant
pieces of syscall handling from recent GLIBC thus fixing the problem.
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 22 July 2009 10:49:00 Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
As described in thread
http://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/uclibc/2009-July/042670.html, uClibc
build is currently broken on m68k. The attached patch ports relevant
pieces of syscall handling from recent GLIBC thus
On Wednesday 22 July 2009 14:44:37 Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 22 July 2009 10:49:00 Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
As described in thread
http://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/uclibc/2009-July/042670.html, uClibc
build is currently broken on m68k. The attached patch