Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 02 July 2009 14:53:03 Ed W wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 02 July 2009 13:04:02 Ed W wrote:
Hi, I'm using a gentoo uclibc system and just updated it to 0.9.30.1
I notice a curious feature of binaries which is causing problems with
som
On Thursday 02 July 2009 14:53:03 Ed W wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 July 2009 13:04:02 Ed W wrote:
> >> Hi, I'm using a gentoo uclibc system and just updated it to 0.9.30.1
> >>
> >> I notice a curious feature of binaries which is causing problems with
> >> some other gentoo eb
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 02 July 2009 13:04:02 Ed W wrote:
Hi, I'm using a gentoo uclibc system and just updated it to 0.9.30.1
I notice a curious feature of binaries which is causing problems with
some other gentoo ebuilds.
Essentially if I use readelf -d, this gives me (amongst o
On Thursday 02 July 2009 13:04:02 Ed W wrote:
> Hi, I'm using a gentoo uclibc system and just updated it to 0.9.30.1
>
> I notice a curious feature of binaries which is causing problems with
> some other gentoo ebuilds.
>
> Essentially if I use readelf -d, this gives me (amongst other things):
>
>
Hi, I'm using a gentoo uclibc system and just updated it to 0.9.30.1
I notice a curious feature of binaries which is causing problems with
some other gentoo ebuilds.
Essentially if I use readelf -d, this gives me (amongst other things):
0x0001 (NEEDED) Shared library: