Re: Are my libs correct?

2009-07-03 Thread Ed W
Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thursday 02 July 2009 14:53:03 Ed W wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thursday 02 July 2009 13:04:02 Ed W wrote: Hi, I'm using a gentoo uclibc system and just updated it to 0.9.30.1 I notice a curious feature of binaries which is causing problems with som

Re: Are my libs correct?

2009-07-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 02 July 2009 14:53:03 Ed W wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Thursday 02 July 2009 13:04:02 Ed W wrote: > >> Hi, I'm using a gentoo uclibc system and just updated it to 0.9.30.1 > >> > >> I notice a curious feature of binaries which is causing problems with > >> some other gentoo eb

Re: Are my libs correct?

2009-07-02 Thread Ed W
Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thursday 02 July 2009 13:04:02 Ed W wrote: Hi, I'm using a gentoo uclibc system and just updated it to 0.9.30.1 I notice a curious feature of binaries which is causing problems with some other gentoo ebuilds. Essentially if I use readelf -d, this gives me (amongst o

Re: Are my libs correct?

2009-07-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 02 July 2009 13:04:02 Ed W wrote: > Hi, I'm using a gentoo uclibc system and just updated it to 0.9.30.1 > > I notice a curious feature of binaries which is causing problems with > some other gentoo ebuilds. > > Essentially if I use readelf -d, this gives me (amongst other things): > >

Are my libs correct?

2009-07-02 Thread Ed W
Hi, I'm using a gentoo uclibc system and just updated it to 0.9.30.1 I notice a curious feature of binaries which is causing problems with some other gentoo ebuilds. Essentially if I use readelf -d, this gives me (amongst other things): 0x0001 (NEEDED) Shared library: