On 03/05/2011 08:11 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> As to xdrproc_t, doesn't that change API WRT both manpage as well as glibc?
Yes. However, it seems to change it to a more correct form given
existing usage. There's no xdrproc I could find that's actually defined
as variadic (every example
Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 03/04/2011 11:22 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > Bernd Schmidt
wrote: > > I've cleaned up a few issues in the
previous version of these > patches, such as those pointed out by Bernhard, a
numer of > whitespace issues, and some dead code. Mark Salter has also poin
On 03/04/2011 11:22 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>
> I've cleaned up a few issues in the previous version of these
> patches, such as those pointed out by Bernhard, a numer of
> whitespace issues, and some dead code. Mark Salter has also pointed
> out
Bernd Schmidt wrote:
I've cleaned up a few issues in the previous version of these patches, such as
those pointed out by Bernhard, a numer of whitespace issues, and some dead
code. Mark Salter has also pointed out that the FINISH_BOOTSTRAP_RELOC macro
isn't actually needed when ld.so is built
I've cleaned up a few issues in the previous version of these patches,
such as those pointed out by Bernhard, a numer of whitespace issues, and
some dead code. Mark Salter has also pointed out that the
FINISH_BOOTSTRAP_RELOC macro isn't actually needed when ld.so is built
with gcc, so I've removed
