> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Woody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: den 27 september 2008 03:40
> To: Peter Kjellerstedt
> Subject: Re: CLOCK_MONOTONIC substitution for uclibc?
>
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Peter Kjellerstedt
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Joakim Tjernlund
> Sent: den 26 september 2008 09:14
> To: Steven Woody
> Cc: uclibc@uclibc.org
> Subject: Re: CLOCK_MONOTONIC substitution for uclibc?
>
> On Fri, 2008-0
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 13:30 +0800, Steven Woody wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see even though uclibc implemented clock_gettime(clock_id, tp), it
> does not support clock type of CLOCK_MONOTONIC. So if I want some
> kind of monotonic time which should not changed by user process ( such
> as setting of date),
Hi,
I see even though uclibc implemented clock_gettime(clock_id, tp), it
does not support clock type of CLOCK_MONOTONIC. So if I want some
kind of monotonic time which should not changed by user process ( such
as setting of date), what should I do?
Thanks.
-
narke
__
