Hi,
Just wanted to check whether cortex A8 (ARM) is supported in uClibc?
If yes, please provide information about which version does that
Thanks
Sagar
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 01:26:33 Sagar Borikar wrote:
> Just wanted to check whether cortex A8 (ARM) is supported in uClibc?
uClibc doesnt care what ARM variant you're using. it does have optional
support for things like EABI/thumb/interwork, but that's a different question.
-mike
signature.a
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 04:18:07PM +0530, Sagar Borikar wrote:
>resending to the list
>
>Sagar
>On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Sagar Borikar wrote:
>> resending to list.
>>
>> Sagar
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Sagar Borikar
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Mike Frysinge
resending to the list
Sagar
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Sagar Borikar wrote:
> resending to list.
>
> Sagar
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Sagar Borikar
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 07 April 2009 01:26:33 Sagar Borikar wrote:
Mike,
All,
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 21:14:36 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 April 2009 14:29:06 Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> > Of course the processor variant we're building uClibc to run on matters!
> that's the decision of the compiler and/or user, not uClibc. building uClibc
> with a differe
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 14:29:06 Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 April 2009 08:55:25 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 07 April 2009 01:26:33 Sagar Borikar wrote:
> > > Just wanted to check whether cortex A8 (ARM) is supported in uClibc?
> >
> > uClibc doesnt care what ARM variant you're u
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 06:48:07 Sagar Borikar wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Sagar Borikar wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Tuesday 07 April 2009 01:26:33 Sagar Borikar wrote:
>>> Just wanted to check whether cortex A8 (ARM) is supported in uClibc?
>>
Hello all!
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 08:55:25 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 April 2009 01:26:33 Sagar Borikar wrote:
> > Just wanted to check whether cortex A8 (ARM) is supported in uClibc?
>
> uClibc doesnt care what ARM variant you're using. it does have optional
> support for things l
Hi Yann,
> I'm all for throwing away this mess as well. As new variants arrive, we'll
> add more of this stuff. And when one will try to compile with a gcc that
> is not recent enough, the -mcpu and -mtune options will not be recognised,
> and the build will break, and we'll be blamed for that.
I
Hector,
All,
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 22:31:07 Hector Oron wrote:
> > I'm all for throwing away this mess as well. As new variants arrive, we'll
> > add more of this stuff. And when one will try to compile with a gcc that
-
> > is not
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 16:09:08 Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 April 2009 21:14:36 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i dont think we should keep enabling lazy people. either the right
> > options are selected by gcc in their toolchain, or they should manually
> > add the -mcpu or whatever flags to
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
that's the decision of the compiler and/or user, not uClibc. building uClibc
with a different CFLAG certainly does not mean "uClibc supports XXX cpu".
thus it does not care what processor *you're* compiling it for.
Isn't it conceivable that there wou
On Monday 06 April 2009 10:26:33 pm Sagar Borikar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just wanted to check whether cortex A8 (ARM) is supported in uClibc?
> If yes, please provide information about which version does that
cortex-a8 has new thumb2 instruction set and uclibc can be compiled in thumb2
mode AFAICT (
I
13 matches
Mail list logo
