Rob Landley wrote:
On Monday 27 October 2008 15:02:19 Rob Landley wrote:
On Monday 27 October 2008 12:50:13 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Sorry for having confused with multiple patches/proposal and emails.
Currently the dl_iterate_phdr symbols is defined in ld-uClibc.so.0 and
libdl.a. The idea is
Rob Landley wrote:
On Monday 27 October 2008 12:50:13 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Sorry for having confused with multiple patches/proposal and emails.
Currently the dl_iterate_phdr symbols is defined in ld-uClibc.so.0 and
libdl.a. The idea is to move into libc.so.0 and libc.a (exactly as glibc
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 06:29:34 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Search in the list for similar issues. I sugegsted a work-around in the
past. I've got also a complete fix for uclibc, but up to now, never
committed.
Carmelo
P.S.
Please send emails in text/plain, not html
You say this while
Hello
First of all: Thank you for all this wonderful stuff!
I am having trouble building uclibc++ with uclibc for the ARM platform.
Upon linking the .so file i get the output below.
It seems that the eh_globals.o and unwind-dw2-fde-glibc.o files are
extracted from gcc libraries, but that they
Search in the list for similar issues. I sugegsted a work-around in the
past. I've got also a complete fix for uclibc, but up to now, never
committed.
Carmelo
P.S.
Please send emails in text/plain, not html
Flemming Madsen wrote:
Hello
First of all: Thank you for all this wonderful stuff!
