Re: MIPS NPTL patches [1/3]

2009-04-10 Thread Dan E
On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 07:06 -0400, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Thursday 09 April 2009 06:10:26 Dan E wrote: On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 04:33 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thursday 09 April 2009 04:01:23 Dan E wrote: I have no interest in the trunk right now. If the NPTL code was

Re: MIPS NPTL patches [1/3]

2009-04-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 10 April 2009 02:03:19 Dan E wrote: On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 07:06 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thursday 09 April 2009 06:10:26 Dan E wrote: On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 04:33 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thursday 09 April 2009 04:01:23 Dan E wrote: I have no interest in the trunk

Re: MIPS NPTL patches [1/3]

2009-04-10 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger wrote: [SNIP] git however ive found to be a complete dream with branching and merging (ive used it with linux, u-boot, personal projects, etc...). we're in the process of migrating to git now (or at least, we're whining to OSU

Re: MIPS NPTL patches [1/3]

2009-04-10 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dan E wrote: It figures. Let's try that again without the word wrapping. I agree with Mike to stop talking, and let's go back to code... -- patch start -- Index: uClibc-nptl/include/unistd.h

Re: MIPS NPTL patches [1/3]

2009-04-10 Thread Dan E
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 08:49 +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dan E wrote: It figures. Let's try that again without the word wrapping. I agree with Mike to stop talking, and let's go back to code... OK --

Re: MIPS NPTL patches [1/3]

2009-04-10 Thread Austin Foxley
Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: Mike, moving to git will be definitely fantastic ;-) YES! That would be positively awesome. -Austin ___ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

Re: MIPS NPTL patches [1/3]

2009-04-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 08 April 2009 23:44:07 Dan E wrote: -- patch start -- posting patches inline meant for direct inclusion really only works when: - it's only 1 patch - patch is at the end of the e-mail multiple patches should either be separate e-mails or attached. there should

Re: MIPS NPTL patches [1/3]

2009-04-09 Thread Khem Raj
On Wednesday 08 April 2009 08:44:07 pm Dan E wrote: It figures. Let's try that again without the word wrapping. -- patch start -- Index: uClibc-nptl/include/unistd.h === --- uClibc-nptl/include/unistd.h

Re: MIPS NPTL patches [1/3]

2009-04-09 Thread Dan E
On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 02:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wednesday 08 April 2009 23:44:07 Dan E wrote: -- patch start -- posting patches inline meant for direct inclusion really only works when: - it's only 1 patch - patch is at the end of the e-mail

Re: MIPS NPTL patches [1/3]

2009-04-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 09 April 2009 04:01:23 Dan E wrote: On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 02:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 08 April 2009 23:44:07 Dan E wrote: -- patch start -- posting patches inline meant for direct inclusion really only works when: - it's only 1 patch -

Re: MIPS NPTL patches [1/3]

2009-04-09 Thread Dan E
On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 04:33 -0400, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Thursday 09 April 2009 04:01:23 Dan E wrote: On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 02:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 08 April 2009 23:44:07 Dan E wrote: -- patch start -- posting patches inline

Re: MIPS NPTL patches [1/3]

2009-04-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 09 April 2009 06:10:26 Dan E wrote: On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 04:33 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thursday 09 April 2009 04:01:23 Dan E wrote: I have no interest in the trunk right now. If the NPTL code was in the trunk then I would wholeheartedly agree with you 100%. As it

Re: MIPS NPTL patches [1/3]

2009-04-08 Thread Dan E
It figures. Let's try that again without the word wrapping. -- patch start -- Index: uClibc-nptl/include/unistd.h === --- uClibc-nptl/include/unistd.h(revision 26031) +++ uClibc-nptl/include/unistd.h