On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 07:06 -0400, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Thursday 09 April 2009 06:10:26 Dan E wrote:
On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 04:33 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 09 April 2009 04:01:23 Dan E wrote:
I have no interest in the trunk right now. If the NPTL code was
On Friday 10 April 2009 02:03:19 Dan E wrote:
On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 07:06 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 09 April 2009 06:10:26 Dan E wrote:
On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 04:33 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 09 April 2009 04:01:23 Dan E wrote:
I have no interest in the trunk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
[SNIP]
git however ive found to be a complete dream with branching and merging (ive
used it with linux, u-boot, personal projects, etc...). we're in the process
of migrating to git now (or at least, we're whining to OSU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan E wrote:
It figures. Let's try that again without the word wrapping.
I agree with Mike to stop talking, and let's go back to code...
-- patch start --
Index: uClibc-nptl/include/unistd.h
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 08:49 +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO
carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan E wrote:
It figures. Let's try that again without the word wrapping.
I agree with Mike to stop talking, and let's go back to code...
OK
--
Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Mike, moving to git will be definitely fantastic ;-)
YES! That would be positively awesome.
-Austin
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
On Wednesday 08 April 2009 23:44:07 Dan E wrote:
-- patch start --
posting patches inline meant for direct inclusion really only works when:
- it's only 1 patch
- patch is at the end of the e-mail
multiple patches should either be separate e-mails or attached. there should
On Wednesday 08 April 2009 08:44:07 pm Dan E wrote:
It figures. Let's try that again without the word wrapping.
-- patch start --
Index: uClibc-nptl/include/unistd.h
===
--- uClibc-nptl/include/unistd.h
On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 02:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Wednesday 08 April 2009 23:44:07 Dan E wrote:
-- patch start --
posting patches inline meant for direct inclusion really only works when:
- it's only 1 patch
- patch is at the end of the e-mail
On Thursday 09 April 2009 04:01:23 Dan E wrote:
On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 02:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 08 April 2009 23:44:07 Dan E wrote:
-- patch start --
posting patches inline meant for direct inclusion really only works when:
- it's only 1 patch
-
On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 04:33 -0400, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Thursday 09 April 2009 04:01:23 Dan E wrote:
On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 02:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 08 April 2009 23:44:07 Dan E wrote:
-- patch start --
posting patches inline
On Thursday 09 April 2009 06:10:26 Dan E wrote:
On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 04:33 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 09 April 2009 04:01:23 Dan E wrote:
I have no interest in the trunk right now. If the NPTL code was in the
trunk then I would wholeheartedly agree with you 100%. As it
It figures. Let's try that again without the word wrapping.
-- patch start --
Index: uClibc-nptl/include/unistd.h
===
--- uClibc-nptl/include/unistd.h(revision 26031)
+++ uClibc-nptl/include/unistd.h
13 matches
Mail list logo