Re: Patch: implement clock_nanosleep

2011-02-22 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 06:48:19PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote: >On 02/19/2011 07:42 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > >> Missing signed-off-by. Other than that the Makefile part will not >> apply anymore, I think. > >Ow. I made a complete mess of these patch submissions; I forgot about >the swi

Re: Patch: implement clock_nanosleep

2011-02-21 Thread Bernd Schmidt
On 02/19/2011 07:42 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > Missing signed-off-by. Other than that the Makefile part will not > apply anymore, I think. Ow. I made a complete mess of these patch submissions; I forgot about the switch to git and worked in an old svn repository. Sorry :-( Here's a ne

Re: Patch: implement clock_nanosleep

2011-02-20 Thread Carmelo Amoroso
Hi hidden_protos should go in the proper header file not in the c source Cheers Carmelo Inviato da iPod Il giorno 19/feb/2011, alle ore 17:00, Bernd Schmidt ha scritto: > This patch, written by Nathan Sidwell, implements clock_nanosleep. Ok? > > > Bernd > >

Re: Patch: implement clock_nanosleep

2011-02-19 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
"Bernd Schmidt" wrote: >This patch, written by Nathan Sidwell, implements clock_nanosleep. Ok? > > >Bernd >___ >uClibc mailing list >uClibc@uclibc.org >http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc Hi, Missing signed-off-by. Other than that the Mak

Patch: implement clock_nanosleep

2011-02-19 Thread Bernd Schmidt
This patch, written by Nathan Sidwell, implements clock_nanosleep. Ok? Bernd Index: include/time.h === --- include/time.h (revision 307155) +++ include/time.h (revision 307156) @@ -349,9 +349,8 @@ extern int clock_gettime (