On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Denys Vlasenko vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 06 April 2010 15:31, Kevin Day wrote:
On 4/6/10, Denys Vlasenko vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Friday 02 April 2010 00:21, Kevin Day wrote:
I am using the NPTL branch on x86, which works perfectly
On Tuesday 06 April 2010 15:31, Kevin Day wrote:
On 4/6/10, Denys Vlasenko vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Friday 02 April 2010 00:21, Kevin Day wrote:
I am using the NPTL branch on x86, which works perfectly fine (in
fact, better than any other stable release since 0.9.28)
The
On 4/6/10, Denys Vlasenko vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Friday 02 April 2010 00:21, Kevin Day wrote:
I am using the NPTL branch on x86, which works perfectly fine (in
fact, better than any other stable release since 0.9.28)
The commit number is:
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Kevin Day thekevin...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using the NPTL branch on x86, which works perfectly fine (in
fact, better than any other stable release since 0.9.28)
The commit number is: cca45baf8353d1e338d232f5bdb2d1d6b357f1da
On 4/6/10, Natanael Copa natanael.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Kevin Day thekevin...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using the NPTL branch on x86, which works perfectly fine (in
fact, better than any other stable release since 0.9.28)
The commit number is:
On Friday 02 April 2010 00:21, Kevin Day wrote:
I am using the NPTL branch on x86, which works perfectly fine (in
fact, better than any other stable release since 0.9.28)
The commit number is: cca45baf8353d1e338d232f5bdb2d1d6b357f1da
I am using the NPTL branch on x86, which works perfectly fine (in
fact, better than any other stable release since 0.9.28)
The commit number is: cca45baf8353d1e338d232f5bdb2d1d6b357f1da
(http://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/commit/?h=nptlid=cca45baf8353d1e338d232f5bdb2d1d6b357f1da)
With the addition of
