Re: RFC: multilib support for uClibc

2008-01-23 Thread Rob Landley
On Tuesday 22 January 2008 06:37:35 Bernd Schmidt wrote: For the Blackfin, we need to compile several versions of uClibc and install them in such a way that the cross compilers will find them. To do this, we've come up with the following patch (combined from multiple contributions by Jie

RFC: multilib support for uClibc

2008-01-22 Thread Bernd Schmidt
For the Blackfin, we need to compile several versions of uClibc and install them in such a way that the cross compilers will find them. To do this, we've come up with the following patch (combined from multiple contributions by Jie Zhang, Mike Frysinger and myself). Essentially, this adds two

Re: RFC: multilib support for uClibc

2008-01-22 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 01:37:35PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote: For the Blackfin, we need to compile several versions of uClibc and install them in such a way that the cross compilers will find them. To do this, we've come up with the following patch (combined from multiple contributions by

Re: RFC: multilib support for uClibc

2008-01-22 Thread Bernd Schmidt
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: We don't have any lib/$(MULTILIB) directories; it was much simpler to put each into its own sysroot and it works nicely at runtime too. Okay.. what kind of multilibs do you have, and what's your directory structure? Maybe Mike or Jie could comment on why exactly we use

Re: RFC: multilib support for uClibc

2008-01-22 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 12:07:05AM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote: Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: We don't have any lib/$(MULTILIB) directories; it was much simpler to put each into its own sysroot and it works nicely at runtime too. Okay.. what kind of multilibs do you have, and what's your