On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Tuesday 13 November 2012 06:31:09 Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> The following patches prefer the old system call if both syscalls are
>>> present. For example, if __NR_open and __NR_
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 November 2012 06:31:09 Markos Chandras wrote:
>> The following patches prefer the old system call if both syscalls are
>> present. For example, if __NR_open and __NR_openat are defined, then
>> open() will use the __NR_open sys
On Tuesday 13 November 2012 06:31:09 Markos Chandras wrote:
> The following patches prefer the old system call if both syscalls are
> present. For example, if __NR_open and __NR_openat are defined, then
> open() will use the __NR_open syscall. If the __NR_open syscall is not
> defined, then open()
