Is this going to be an ABI-breaking release?
(I'm prepared either way. My 0.9.30.3 to 0.9.31 rollover went just fine.)
Michael Deutschmann mich...@talamasca.ocis.net
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Michael Deutschmann
mich...@talamasca.ocis.net wrote:
Is this going to be an ABI-breaking release?
(I'm prepared either way. My 0.9.30.3 to 0.9.31 rollover went just fine.)
Switching to NPTL will break ABI.
--
Natanael Copa
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Natanael Copa wrote:
Switching to NPTL will break ABI.
Not an issue for me, as I don't use threads.
We can still configure them out, right?
Michael Deutschmann mich...@talamasca.ocis.net
___
uClibc mailing list
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Natanael Copa natanael.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Michael Deutschmann
mich...@talamasca.ocis.net wrote:
Is this going to be an ABI-breaking release?
(I'm prepared either way. My 0.9.30.3 to 0.9.31 rollover went just fine.)
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Michael Deutschmann
mich...@talamasca.ocis.net wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Natanael Copa wrote:
Switching to NPTL will break ABI.
Not an issue for me, as I don't use threads.
We can still configure them out, right?
yes
Michael Deutschmann
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I will have a look at the strtoq ASAP. Feel free to test current master
which is what RC1 will essentially be.
I would like to have the 2 patches in here
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=2713
On Sunday 28 November 2010 07:11:14 Natanael Copa wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I will have a look at the strtoq ASAP. Feel free to test current master
which is what RC1 will essentially be.
I would like to have the
On Tuesday 02 November 2010 14:22:00 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
Well, I need to merge in microblaze (pending input, not a show-stopper
but would be nice) but other than that, i'm not aware of any other
blockers for 0.9.32.. are you?
Let's install a mental countdown.. burry my grandma on
Hi,
I will have a look at the strtoq ASAP. Feel free to test current master
which is what RC1 will essentially be.
On 28 Nov 2010 00:15, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
On Tuesday 02 November 2010 14:22:00 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
Well, I need to merge in microblaze (pending input,
On Tuesday 02 November 2010 14:22:00 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 02:42:48PM +0100, Natanael Copa wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
I hate to bring up the word release on this list, but is there any
chance of integrating
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 02:42:48PM +0100, Natanael Copa wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
I hate to bring up the word release on this list, but is there any chance
of
integrating this patch actually meaning something in the forseeable future?
I
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 02:42:48PM +0100, Natanael Copa wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
I hate to bring up the word release on this list, but is there any chance
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
I hate to bring up the word release on this list, but is there any chance of
integrating this patch actually meaning something in the forseeable future?
I wonder the same.
I am about to create the second release of Alpine
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Natanael Copa natanael.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
I hate to bring up the word release on this list, but is there any chance
of
integrating this patch actually meaning something in the forseeable
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
On Tuesday 26 October 2010 01:51:29 Khem Raj wrote:
On (23/10/10 14:57), Rob Landley wrote:
On Tuesday 30 March 2010 06:11:44 Michael Deutschmann wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Natanael Copa wrote:
and with m4-1.4.14 i
On Sunday 31 October 2010 16:43:00 Khem Raj wrote:
heh it was a suggestion rather than an order as you interpreted :) and
because you have spend time to understand the problem to its entirety
it would be more effective if you looked
this aspect of it as well, which you did so thanks for it.
On (23/10/10 14:57), Rob Landley wrote:
On Tuesday 30 March 2010 06:11:44 Michael Deutschmann wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Natanael Copa wrote:
and with m4-1.4.14 i get this:
In file included from pipe.c:48:
./spawn.h:112: error: field '_sp' has incomplete type
make[3]: ***
On Tuesday 30 March 2010 06:11:44 Michael Deutschmann wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Natanael Copa wrote:
and with m4-1.4.14 i get this:
In file included from pipe.c:48:
./spawn.h:112: error: field '_sp' has incomplete type
make[3]: *** [pipe.o] Error 1
This sounds like a problem I've
Hi,
I just wonder if anyone have tried compile latest bison and m4 with uclibc.
With bison-2.4.2 I get this error:
depbase=`echo pipe.o | sed 's|[^/]*$|.deps/|;s|\.o$||'`;\
ccache gcc -std=gnu99 -I. -march=i486 -Os -fomit-frame-pointer
-pipe -march=i486 -Os -fomit-frame-pointer
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Natanael Copa wrote:
and with m4-1.4.14 i get this:
In file included from pipe.c:48:
./spawn.h:112: error: field '_sp' has incomplete type
make[3]: *** [pipe.o] Error 1
This sounds like a problem I've had on my own system, which is
threadless. So linuxthreads has
20 matches
Mail list logo
