On Tuesday 16 September 2008 02:48:49 Matthieu CASTET wrote:
Hi,
Rob Landley a écrit :
IIRC
there have been some issues in the past... so, unless we are totally
sure, we need to keep the working/stable and old linuxthreads.old.
No, what we do is we keep the 0.9.29 tarball around and
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 05:12:15 Will Newton wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 7:23 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
1) How platform specific is it?
Fully, TLS relocations are different from one arch to another.
2) Does it actually have anything to do with nptl?
Hi,
Rob Landley a écrit :
IIRC
there have been some issues in the past... so, unless we are totally
sure, we need to keep the working/stable and old linuxthreads.old.
No, what we do is we keep the 0.9.29 tarball around and if people have bugs
trying to use 0.9.30 they _report_ them to
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 7:23 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) How platform specific is it?
Fully, TLS relocations are different from one arch to another.
2) Does it actually have anything to do with nptl?
Nothing, just dynamic linker, and obviously your compiler has to
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Matthieu CASTET
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who said anything about NPTL? Right now, in 0.9.29, there's LINUXTHREADS_OLD
and there's a second implementation of Linuxthreads that most people haven't
been testing because they're still on LINUXTHREADS_OLD. There's
Rob Landley wrote:
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 01:23:37 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
1) How platform specific is it?
Fully, TLS relocations are different from one arch to another.
Ok.
2) Does it actually have anything to do with nptl?
Nothing, just dynamic linker, and obviously your compiler
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:28:19PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Well, we could ship now with a -rc1. Adding bug fixes as someone have
Consider trunk the RC. bugs.uclibc.org has quite some stuff that
currently does not work and also there were reports on this very
list (e.g. the glob()
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 12:28 +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Rob Landley wrote:
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 01:23:37 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
1) How platform specific is it?
Fully, TLS relocations are different from one arch to another.
[SNIP]
IIRC
there have been some issues in the
Will Newton wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 7:23 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) How platform specific is it?
Fully, TLS relocations are different from one arch to another.
2) Does it actually have anything to do with nptl?
Nothing, just dynamic linker, and obviously your
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:28:19PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Well, we could ship now with a -rc1. Adding bug fixes as someone have
Consider trunk the RC. bugs.uclibc.org has quite some stuff that
currently does not work and also there were reports on
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 01:03:15PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 12:28 +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Rob Landley wrote:
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 01:23:37 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
1) How platform specific is it?
Fully, TLS relocations are different from one arch to
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 01:44:43PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:28:19PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Well, we could ship now with a -rc1. Adding bug fixes as someone have
Consider trunk the RC. bugs.uclibc.org has quite some
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 13:55 +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 01:03:15PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 12:28 +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Rob Landley wrote:
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 01:23:37 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
1) How platform
Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
No, what we do is we keep the 0.9.29 tarball around and if people have bugs
trying to use 0.9.30 they _report_ them to us. If they want to use the old
threading code, they can use the old version of the library. If they want
the new features, then they help us find
Rob Landley wrote:
On Thursday 28 August 2008 09:25:32 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Looking at what we have into the nptl branch is useful.
Walk trough ldso directory and look for USE_TLS to see where you should
put your hands to add TLS support. Working code is a good guide.
Feel free to ask for
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:58:50PM +0300, Cristi Magherusan wrote:
Said that, I don't think addign TLS support for i386 is difficult, but
we need someone having time to spend on it.
Do you mean adding TLS support for the old linuxthreads branch on x86?
Hello,
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 13:14 +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Cristi Magherusan wrote:
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 08:34 +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
Cristi Magherusan wrote:
Hello,
Can anyone tell which revision of the NPTL branch is tested and
confirmed to work well on x86?
None,
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:58:50PM +0300, Cristi Magherusan wrote:
Said that, I don't think addign TLS support for i386 is difficult, but
we need someone having time to spend on it.
Do you mean adding TLS support for the old linuxthreads branch on x86?
Perhaps it would be better to update
18 matches
Mail list logo
