Hi,
master is now potentially open to
- merge future into master
- merge prelink into master
- merge ldso-future into master
(in this order).
To do this, ideally one would bring future up to date, then merge it
back into master etc.
Peter, do you see fit to
$ git checkout future
$ git pull --reb
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> master is now potentially open to
> - merge future into master
> - merge prelink into master
> - merge ldso-future into master
> (in this order).
>
> To do this, ideally one would bring future up to date, then merge it
> bac
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 14:22:11 -0700
> Von: Khem Raj
> An: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> CC: uclibc@uclibc.org, p...@gmx.net
> Betreff: Re: future merge
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> wrote:
> >
On 08/06/2011 23.22, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> master is now potentially open to
>> - merge future into master
>> - merge prelink into master
>> - merge ldso-future into master
>> (in this order).
>>
>> To do this, ideally one
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
wrote:
> On 08/06/2011 23.22, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> master is now potentially open to
>>> - merge future into master
>>> - merge prelink into master
>>> - merge ldso-f
On 13/06/2011 22.17, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
> wrote:
>> On 08/06/2011 23.22, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>>> wrote:
Hi,
master is now potentially open to
- merge future into master
>>
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 17:17, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> master is now potentially open to
> - merge future into master
> - merge prelink into master
> - merge ldso-future into master
> (in this order).
>
> To do this, ideally one would bring future up to date, then merge it
> back into mast
On (24/06/11 13:39), Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 17:17, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> > master is now potentially open to
> > - merge future into master
> > - merge prelink into master
> > - merge ldso-future into master
> > (in this order).
> >
> > To do this, ideally one wo
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 13:59, Khem Raj wrote:
> On (24/06/11 13:39), Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 17:17, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>> > master is now potentially open to
>> > - merge future into master
>> > - merge prelink into master
>> > - merge ldso-future into master
>
On 24/06/2011 16.37, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> On 13/06/2011 22.17, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
>> wrote:
>>> On 08/06/2011 23.22, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> master is now
On 27/06/2011 10.25, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> On 24/06/2011 16.37, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>> On 13/06/2011 22.17, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
>>> wrote:
On 08/06/2011 23.22, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fische
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> On 27/06/2011 10.25, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>> On 24/06/2011 16.37, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>>> On 13/06/2011 22.17, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
wrote:
> On 08/06/2011 23.22, Khem Raj wrot
On 27/06/2011 21.53, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
> wrote:
>> On 27/06/2011 10.25, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>>> On 24/06/2011 16.37, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
On 13/06/2011 22.17, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
>
On 28/06/2011 9.30, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> On 27/06/2011 21.53, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
>> wrote:
>>> On 27/06/2011 10.25, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
On 24/06/2011 16.37, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> On 13/06/2011 22.17, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Mon
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 17:17, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>> master is now potentially open to
>> - merge future into master
>> - merge prelink into master
>> - merge ldso-future into master
>> (in this order).
>>
>> To do this, ideally
Hi,
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Mike Frysinger
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 17:17, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> >> master is now potentially open to
> >> - merge future into master
> >> - merge prelink into master
> >> - merge ldso-future into master
> >> (in this order).
> >>
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Peter Mazinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Mike Frysinger
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 17:17, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>> >> master is now potentially open to
>> >> - merge future into master
>> >> - merge prelink into maste
Khem, the master below is unbuildable, fails on epoll.c with your config. This
epoll.c is the one from master, not mine ;-(
Peter
> git://github.com/kraj/uClibc.git
--
NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren!
Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone
___
On Jul 9, 2011, at 6:08 AM, "Peter Mazinger" wrote:
> Khem, the master below is unbuildable, fails on epoll.c with your config.
> This epoll.c is the one from master, not mine ;-(
I mentioned in my email that I did not push the patches that I have on top of
yours to make it build let me push
>
>
> On Jul 9, 2011, at 6:08 AM, "Peter Mazinger" wrote:
>
> > Khem, the master below is unbuildable, fails on epoll.c with your
> config. This epoll.c is the one from master, not mine ;-(
>
> I mentioned in my email that I did not push the patches that I have on top
> of yours to make it bui
>
> On Jul 9, 2011, at 6:08 AM, "Peter Mazinger" wrote:
>
> > Khem, the master below is unbuildable, fails on epoll.c with your
> config. This epoll.c is the one from master, not mine ;-(
committed a fix to the MIPS problem to future branch, affects though all archs
using NPTL or LT new. The p
Hi Peter/Bernhard
We have a regression on master which is that systemd does not boot the system
anymore
whereas it works fine with 0.9.33 branch so I did not bisecting and this boiled
down
to below commit. If I revert that then everything is working again. Please take
a look
what could be wron
n: Khem Raj
> An: uclibc@uclibc.org, rep.dot@gmail.com, p...@gmx.net
> Betreff: Regression caused by future merge utent.c, wtent.c: move functions
> from utxent.c
>
> Hi Peter/Bernhard
>
> We have a regression on master which is that systemd does not boot the
> sys
23 matches
Mail list logo