future merge

2011-06-08 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Hi, master is now potentially open to - merge future into master - merge prelink into master - merge ldso-future into master (in this order). To do this, ideally one would bring future up to date, then merge it back into master etc. Peter, do you see fit to $ git checkout future $ git pull --reb

Re: future merge

2011-06-08 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > Hi, > > master is now potentially open to > - merge future into master > - merge prelink into master > - merge ldso-future into master > (in this order). > > To do this, ideally one would bring future up to date, then merge it > bac

Re: future merge

2011-06-08 Thread Peter Mazinger
Original-Nachricht > Datum: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 14:22:11 -0700 > Von: Khem Raj > An: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer > CC: uclibc@uclibc.org, p...@gmx.net > Betreff: Re: future merge > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer > wrote: > >

Re: future merge

2011-06-13 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 08/06/2011 23.22, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> master is now potentially open to >> - merge future into master >> - merge prelink into master >> - merge ldso-future into master >> (in this order). >> >> To do this, ideally one

Re: future merge

2011-06-13 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > On 08/06/2011 23.22, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> master is now potentially open to >>> - merge future into master >>> - merge prelink into master >>> - merge ldso-f

Re: future merge

2011-06-24 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 13/06/2011 22.17, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO > wrote: >> On 08/06/2011 23.22, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer >>> wrote: Hi, master is now potentially open to - merge future into master >>

Re: future merge

2011-06-24 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 17:17, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > master is now potentially open to > - merge future into master > - merge prelink into master > - merge ldso-future into master > (in this order). > > To do this, ideally one would bring future up to date, then merge it > back into mast

Re: future merge

2011-06-24 Thread Khem Raj
On (24/06/11 13:39), Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 17:17, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > > master is now potentially open to > > - merge future into master > > - merge prelink into master > > - merge ldso-future into master > > (in this order). > > > > To do this, ideally one wo

Re: future merge

2011-06-24 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 13:59, Khem Raj wrote: > On (24/06/11 13:39), Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 17:17, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >> > master is now potentially open to >> > - merge future into master >> > - merge prelink into master >> > - merge ldso-future into master >

Re: future merge

2011-06-27 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 24/06/2011 16.37, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > On 13/06/2011 22.17, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO >> wrote: >>> On 08/06/2011 23.22, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > Hi, > > master is now

Re: future merge

2011-06-27 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 27/06/2011 10.25, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > On 24/06/2011 16.37, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: >> On 13/06/2011 22.17, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO >>> wrote: On 08/06/2011 23.22, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fische

Re: future merge

2011-06-27 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > On 27/06/2011 10.25, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: >> On 24/06/2011 16.37, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: >>> On 13/06/2011 22.17, Khem Raj wrote: On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > On 08/06/2011 23.22, Khem Raj wrot

Re: future merge

2011-06-28 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 27/06/2011 21.53, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO > wrote: >> On 27/06/2011 10.25, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: >>> On 24/06/2011 16.37, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: On 13/06/2011 22.17, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO >

Re: future merge

2011-07-01 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 28/06/2011 9.30, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > On 27/06/2011 21.53, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO >> wrote: >>> On 27/06/2011 10.25, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: On 24/06/2011 16.37, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > On 13/06/2011 22.17, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Mon

Re: future merge

2011-07-07 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 17:17, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >> master is now potentially open to >> - merge future into master >> - merge prelink into master >> - merge ldso-future into master >> (in this order). >> >> To do this, ideally

Re: future merge

2011-07-07 Thread Peter Mazinger
Hi, > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Mike Frysinger > wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 17:17, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > >> master is now potentially open to > >> - merge future into master > >> - merge prelink into master > >> - merge ldso-future into master > >> (in this order). > >>

Re: future merge

2011-07-07 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Peter Mazinger wrote: > Hi, > >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Mike Frysinger >> wrote: >> > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 17:17, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >> >> master is now potentially open to >> >> - merge future into master >> >> - merge prelink into maste

Re: future merge

2011-07-09 Thread Peter Mazinger
Khem, the master below is unbuildable, fails on epoll.c with your config. This epoll.c is the one from master, not mine ;-( Peter > git://github.com/kraj/uClibc.git -- NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren! Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone ___

Re: future merge

2011-07-09 Thread Khem Raj
On Jul 9, 2011, at 6:08 AM, "Peter Mazinger" wrote: > Khem, the master below is unbuildable, fails on epoll.c with your config. > This epoll.c is the one from master, not mine ;-( I mentioned in my email that I did not push the patches that I have on top of yours to make it build let me push

Re: future merge

2011-07-09 Thread Peter Mazinger
> > > On Jul 9, 2011, at 6:08 AM, "Peter Mazinger" wrote: > > > Khem, the master below is unbuildable, fails on epoll.c with your > config. This epoll.c is the one from master, not mine ;-( > > I mentioned in my email that I did not push the patches that I have on top > of yours to make it bui

Re: future merge

2011-07-10 Thread Peter Mazinger
> > On Jul 9, 2011, at 6:08 AM, "Peter Mazinger" wrote: > > > Khem, the master below is unbuildable, fails on epoll.c with your > config. This epoll.c is the one from master, not mine ;-( committed a fix to the MIPS problem to future branch, affects though all archs using NPTL or LT new. The p

Regression caused by future merge utent.c, wtent.c: move functions from utxent.c

2012-09-10 Thread Khem Raj
Hi Peter/Bernhard We have a regression on master which is that systemd does not boot the system anymore whereas it works fine with 0.9.33 branch so I did not bisecting and this boiled down to below commit. If I revert that then everything is working again. Please take a look what could be wron

Re: Regression caused by future merge utent.c, wtent.c: move functions from utxent.c

2012-09-13 Thread Peter Mazinger
n: Khem Raj > An: uclibc@uclibc.org, rep.dot@gmail.com, p...@gmx.net > Betreff: Regression caused by future merge utent.c, wtent.c: move functions > from utxent.c > > Hi Peter/Bernhard > > We have a regression on master which is that systemd does not boot the > sys