On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 19:03 -0500, Kevin Day wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Vallevand, Mark K
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This patch was intended to fix a memory leak, not the count overflow.
> > We still have some problem in that area. We resolved it by not calling
> > dlopen() d
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Vallevand, Mark K
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch was intended to fix a memory leak, not the count overflow.
> We still have some problem in that area. We resolved it by not calling
> dlopen() dlclose() but rather calling dlopen() just once and reusing the
attachments from all computers.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Day [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 4:11 PM
To: Vallevand, Mark K
Cc: uclibc@uclibc.org
Subject: Re: libdl usage count wrapping
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Vallevand, Mark K
<[EMAIL PROTEC
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Vallevand, Mark K
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And, here's the patch I used to fix the memory leak.
>
> --- old/ldso/libdl/libdl.c 2008-09-17 08:42:34.0 -0500
> +++ uClibc/ldso/libdl/libdl.c 2008-09-16 15:14:44.0 -0500
> @@ -632,6 +632,13 @@
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Vallevand, Mark K
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 9:53 AM
To: uclibc@uclibc.org
Subject: RE: libdl usage count wrapping
I'd be interested to see if you see memory leaking as this program runs.
I saw a
-mail
and its attachments from all computers.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Day [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 5:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Vallevand, Mark K; uclibc@uclibc.org
Subject: Re: libdl usage count wrapping
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Ca
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 17:04 -0500, Kevin Day wrote:
>
> I felt the need to test this on my uClibc 0.9.28.3
> and got the following segfault:
>
> Call ... 32766/5
> File not found
> opened 1
> closed 0
>
> Call ... 32767/5
> File not found
> opened 1
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
er and delete the e-mail
>> and its attachments from all computers.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of Phil Estes
>> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 9:45 PM
>> To: uclibc@uclibc.o
ATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you
> received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail
> and its attachments from all computers.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Beha
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Phil Estes
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 9:45 PM
To: uclibc@uclibc.org
Subject: libdl usage count wrapping
Recently I was looking into an issue where someone was claiming pam was
segfaulting after a lot of usa
Recently I was looking into an issue where someone was claiming pam was
segfaulting after a lot of usage (lots of calls to authenticate
users--usually around 5K calls). My investigation led me to the point
where I realized that the dlopen() and dlclose() management of ref.
counting is not balanced
11 matches
Mail list logo