-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob Landley wrote:
> On Monday 23 November 2009 12:14:07 Austin Foxley wrote:
>> On 11/23/2009 01:23 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>>> Good idea.
>>> Is there something preventing a rename of nptl_merge -> nptl now?
>> Done. nptl_merge is now npt
On 11/23/2009 07:51 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
On Sunday 22 November 2009 14:15:23 Austin Foxley wrote:
For my own sanity, I'm killing (renaming) the non master based nptl
branch. The difference of effort in keeping the two synced to master is
quite significant.
For the master based nptl_merge, all
On Monday 23 November 2009 12:14:07 Austin Foxley wrote:
> On 11/23/2009 01:23 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> > Good idea.
> > Is there something preventing a rename of nptl_merge -> nptl now?
>
> Done. nptl_merge is now nptl.
>
> -Austin
Confused. I'm testing via:
git archive --prefix=uC
On Sunday 22 November 2009 14:15:23 Austin Foxley wrote:
> For my own sanity, I'm killing (renaming) the non master based nptl
> branch. The difference of effort in keeping the two synced to master is
> quite significant.
>
> For the master based nptl_merge, all I have to do is a
> 'git merge origi
On 11/23/2009 01:23 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> Good idea.
> Is there something preventing a rename of nptl_merge -> nptl now?
Done. nptl_merge is now nptl.
-Austin
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Austin Foxley wrote:
>
> On 11/23/2009 01:23 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>>> Good idea.
>>> Is there something preventing a rename of nptl_merge -> nptl now?
>
> Not particularly. The only issue is that someone out there might try to
> push
On 11/23/2009 01:23 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
Good idea.
Is there something preventing a rename of nptl_merge -> nptl now?
Not particularly. The only issue is that someone out there might try to
push to the 'nptl' branch, and it would fail/break. Pretty much a
non-issue now. I'll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>> "Carmelo" == Carmelo AMOROSO writes:
>
> Carmelo> If you are going to use buildroot, there is a problem during
> Carmelo> the configuration of the final gcc that will prevent to use
> Carmelo> the proper unwinding.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:28:45AM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Austin Foxley wrote:
>>> For my own sanity, I'm killing (renaming) the non master based nptl
>>
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:28:45AM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Austin Foxley wrote:
>> For my own sanity, I'm killing (renaming) the non master based nptl
>> branch. The difference of effort in keeping the two synced to master is
>> quite signifi
> "Carmelo" == Carmelo AMOROSO writes:
Carmelo> If you are going to use buildroot, there is a problem during
Carmelo> the configuration of the final gcc that will prevent to use
Carmelo> the proper unwinding.
Carmelo> I did a fixed times ago on an very old buildroot version,
Carmelo> un
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Austin Foxley wrote:
> For my own sanity, I'm killing (renaming) the non master based nptl
> branch. The difference of effort in keeping the two synced to master is
> quite significant.
>
> For the master based nptl_merge, all I have to do is a
> 'git
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> Twas brillig at 02:41:33 23.11.2009 UTC+06 when dotted...@dottedmag.net did
> gyre and gimble:
>
> AF>> There is a pthread test suite in LTS that would probably be a good
> AF>> place to start.
>
> MG> Google does not ret
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Austin Foxley wrote:
> On 11/22/2009 12:41 PM, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
>>
>> Twas brillig at 12:31:37 22.11.2009 UTC-08 when aust...@cetoncorp.com
>> did gyre and gimble:
>>
>> >> By the way, is there work suitable for those who are not
>> enlightene
On 11/22/2009 12:41 PM, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
Twas brillig at 12:31:37 22.11.2009 UTC-08 when aust...@cetoncorp.com did gyre
and gimble:
>> By the way, is there work suitable for those who are not enlightened
>> by NPTL stuff yet to make merge happen sooner? Something like
>> "compil
On 11/22/2009 12:46 PM, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
http://ltp.sourceforge.net/ - this one?
Right that one, sorry.
-Austin
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
Twas brillig at 02:41:33 23.11.2009 UTC+06 when dotted...@dottedmag.net did
gyre and gimble:
AF>> There is a pthread test suite in LTS that would probably be a good
AF>> place to start.
MG> Google does not return anything relevant for "LTS". Is that "Linux
MG> Test Suite"?
http://ltp.sourc
Twas brillig at 12:31:37 22.11.2009 UTC-08 when aust...@cetoncorp.com did gyre
and gimble:
>> By the way, is there work suitable for those who are not enlightened
>> by NPTL stuff yet to make merge happen sooner? Something like
>> "compile uClibc for arch foo;
By the way, do I need to config
Also, FYI:
git remote prune origin
Will get rid of the stale origin/nptl branch after you pull.
-Austin
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
Twas brillig at 12:15:23 22.11.2009 UTC-08 when aust...@cetoncorp.com did gyre
and gimble:
AF> I have so little time to work on uClibc, that I would rather spend
AF> it actually fixing problems, than just doing very manual syncing
AF> wor
Twas brillig at 12:15:23 22.11.2009 UTC-08 when aust...@cetoncorp.com did gyre
and gimble:
AF> I have so little time to work on uClibc, that I would rather spend
AF> it actually fixing problems, than just doing very manual syncing
AF> work...
By the way, is there work suitable for those who
For my own sanity, I'm killing (renaming) the non master based nptl
branch. The difference of effort in keeping the two synced to master is
quite significant.
For the master based nptl_merge, all I have to do is a
'git merge origin/master' and fixup any conflicts. Done.
For the old nptl branch,
22 matches
Mail list logo
