RE: optimized static library segfaults

2007-06-23 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Connolly > Sent: den 21 juni 2007 22:48 > To: uclibc@uclibc.org > Subject: optimized static library segfaults > > Hello. Before making a bug report I want to ch

Re: optimized static library segfaults

2007-06-22 Thread Rob Landley
On Thursday 21 June 2007 18:42:16 Rich DAddio wrote: > Hi, > We saw a problem like this in one of our PPC buildroot chains a some > months back. Do you know what version of uClibc you are using? I seem to > vaguely recall that we either upgraded our uClibc or used a compatability > option to get

Re: optimized static library segfaults

2007-06-22 Thread Robert Connolly
On Thursday June 21 2007 06:42:16 pm you wrote: > Hi, > We saw a problem like this in one of our PPC buildroot chains a some > months back. Do you know what version of uClibc you are using? I seem to > vaguely recall that we either upgraded our uClibc or used a compatability > option to get aroun

Re: optimized static library segfaults

2007-06-21 Thread Rich DAddio
Hi, We saw a problem like this in one of our PPC buildroot chains a some months back. Do you know what version of uClibc you are using? I seem to vaguely recall that we either upgraded our uClibc or used a compatability option to get around it. If no one else has a better answer I will

optimized static library segfaults

2007-06-21 Thread Robert Connolly
Hello. Before making a bug report I want to check if any of you are familiar with this... If I build uClibc with -O1, -O2, or -Os, and then statically link a program to the new uClibc, the program will segfault. Dynamically linked programs run fine, and if I build uClibc with -O0 both static and