> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Connolly
> Sent: den 21 juni 2007 22:48
> To: uclibc@uclibc.org
> Subject: optimized static library segfaults
>
> Hello. Before making a bug report I want to ch
On Thursday 21 June 2007 18:42:16 Rich DAddio wrote:
> Hi,
> We saw a problem like this in one of our PPC buildroot chains a some
> months back. Do you know what version of uClibc you are using? I seem to
> vaguely recall that we either upgraded our uClibc or used a compatability
> option to get
On Thursday June 21 2007 06:42:16 pm you wrote:
> Hi,
> We saw a problem like this in one of our PPC buildroot chains a some
> months back. Do you know what version of uClibc you are using? I seem to
> vaguely recall that we either upgraded our uClibc or used a compatability
> option to get aroun
Hi,
We saw a problem like this in one of our PPC buildroot chains a some months
back. Do you know what version of uClibc you are using? I seem to vaguely
recall that we either upgraded our uClibc or used a compatability option to get
around it.
If no one else has a better answer I will
Hello. Before making a bug report I want to check if any of you are familiar
with this... If I build uClibc with -O1, -O2, or -Os, and then statically
link a program to the new uClibc, the program will segfault. Dynamically
linked programs run fine, and if I build uClibc with -O0 both static and