Re: problem with "make install" of cross-toolchain

2008-11-18 Thread Brett Neumeier
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 01:58:44PM -0600, Brett Neumeier wrote: >>Oops! OK. It turns out that "make install" must now be given the same >>"CROSS=" parameter as the "make" command. That wasn't the case in >>0.9.29

Re: problem with "make install" of cross-toolchain

2008-11-17 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 01:58:44PM -0600, Brett Neumeier wrote: >On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Brett Neumeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I am building a cross-toolchain targeting mipsel-unknown-linux-uclibc, >> using GCC 4.3.2, binutils 2.19, linux kernel 2.6.27.6, uclibc 0.9.30. >> >> I had

Re: problem with "make install" of cross-toolchain

2008-11-17 Thread Brett Neumeier
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Brett Neumeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am building a cross-toolchain targeting mipsel-unknown-linux-uclibc, > using GCC 4.3.2, binutils 2.19, linux kernel 2.6.27.6, uclibc 0.9.30. > > I had to patch libpthread/linuxthreads.old/sysdeps/mips/pt-machine.h > to g

problem with "make install" of cross-toolchain

2008-11-17 Thread Brett Neumeier
Hello! I am building a cross-toolchain targeting mipsel-unknown-linux-uclibc, using GCC 4.3.2, binutils 2.19, linux kernel 2.6.27.6, uclibc 0.9.30. I had to patch libpthread/linuxthreads.old/sysdeps/mips/pt-machine.h to get it to build (basically, removing the static definition of _test_and_set f