after moving from svn to git, the docs/ subdir of trunk/ wasn't migrated
anywhere. any suggestions on where to restore these ? i'm not sure we can
exclude subdirs when using `git archive`, so we can't add them to the main
repo. maybe start a new toplevel git repo and add it to uClibc.git as a
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> after moving from svn to git, the docs/ subdir of trunk/ wasn't migrated
> anywhere. any suggestions on where to restore these ? i'm not sure we can
> exclude subdirs when using `git archive`, so we can't add them to the main
> repo. maybe
On Thursday 03 May 2012 23:10:00 Khem Raj wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > after moving from svn to git, the docs/ subdir of trunk/ wasn't migrated
> > anywhere. any suggestions on where to restore these ? i'm not sure we
> > can exclude subdirs when using `git
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> my concern isn't history, it's the 11MB footprint (7.5 when compressed in a
> tarball) mostly due to the pdfs. we don't want to include that in the release
> tarball when that's only 2.7MB right now.
yes it occured to me later. I think h
Hi,
We could stick them in the website repo.
What do you think?
On 4 May 2012 07:14, "Khem Raj" wrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> my concern isn't hist...
yes it occured to me later. I think having a separate docs repo makes sense
then
_
On Friday 04 May 2012 02:00:05 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> We could stick them in the website repo.
> What do you think?
add a new "Specs" link under Documentation ? and have the uclibc/docs/ subdir
have a small text file pointing people there ?
sounds like it can work. i'll gather all t
On 4 May 2012 08:45, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 04 May 2012 02:00:05 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>> We could stick them in the website repo.
>> What do you think?
>
> add a new "Specs" link under Documentation ? and have the uclibc/docs/ subdir
> have a small text file pointing people
> "Mike" == Mike Frysinger writes:
Mike> after moving from svn to git, the docs/ subdir of trunk/ wasn't
Mike> migrated anywhere. any suggestions on where to restore these ?
Mike> i'm not sure we can exclude subdirs when using `git archive`, so
Mike> we can't add them to the main repo.
On Friday 04 May 2012 07:44:07 Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> > "Mike" == Mike Frysinger writes:
> Mike> after moving from svn to git, the docs/ subdir of trunk/ wasn't
> Mike> migrated anywhere. any suggestions on where to restore these ?
> Mike> i'm not sure we can exclude subdirs when using `
On Friday 04 May 2012 13:43:30 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 04 May 2012 07:44:07 Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> > > "Mike" == Mike Frysinger writes:
> > Mike> after moving from svn to git, the docs/ subdir of trunk/ wasn't
> > Mike> migrated anywhere. any suggestions on where to restore thes
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
>> ATTRIBUTES
>> export-ignore
>> Files and directories with the attribute export-ignore won’t be
>> added to archive files. See gitattributes(5) for details.
>
> thanks, this seems to work. people mind if i add
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 04 May 2012 13:43:30 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Friday 04 May 2012 07:44:07 Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>> > > "Mike" == Mike Frysinger writes:
>> > Mike> after moving from svn to git, the docs/ subdir of trunk/ wasn't
>> > Mike
On Friday 04 May 2012 14:06:24 Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > hmm, thinking a little more, maybe adding 10MB of pdfs to the source repo
> > isn't a good thing as they'll always be in the history of the repo, and
> > that is only like 22MB today. so i'l
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 04 May 2012 14:06:24 Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > hmm, thinking a little more, maybe adding 10MB of pdfs to the source repo
>> > isn't a good thing as they'll always be in the histo
On 4 May 2012 20:59, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Friday 04 May 2012 14:06:24 Khem Raj wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> > hmm, thinking a little more, maybe adding 10MB of pdfs to the source repo
>>> > isn't a
i've started a page:
http://uclibc.org/specs.html
and pushed out the files:
http://uclibc.org/docs/
hopefully people find these useful :)
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
uClibc mailing list
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i've started a page:
> http://uclibc.org/specs.html
> and pushed out the files:
> http://uclibc.org/docs/
>
> hopefully people find these useful :)
Thanks for providing these docs!
Unfortunately, many OSS project lacks of up2da
On Saturday 05 May 2012 06:31:54 Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Are in uClibc sources tags (like in Linux-kernel sources) foreseen to
> create docs on request?
i don't understand what you're asking
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
__
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 05 May 2012 06:31:54 Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> Are in uClibc sources tags (like in Linux-kernel sources) foreseen to
>> create docs on request?
>
> i don't understand what you're asking
> -mike
By "tags" or "markers" - Sorry, don't k
On Saturday 05 May 2012 15:01:30 Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Saturday 05 May 2012 06:31:54 Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> Are in uClibc sources tags (like in Linux-kernel sources) foreseen to
> >> create docs on request?
> >
> > i don't understand wh
20 matches
Mail list logo
