On Friday 26 September 2008 10:06:22 Chase Douglas wrote:
Has anyone else tried to compile openssh against the new linuxthreads
stack? When I tried a few weeks ago it failed to compile auth-pam.c.
In that file they do some pretty wacky stuff like redefining some of
the pthread functions.
On Thursday 25 September 2008 16:53:24 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 04:49:54AM +0200, Stefan de Konink wrote:
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer schreef:
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 09:56:13AM +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
Indeed I've few pending patches to push that may be
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 02:17:30AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
Removing LINUXTHREADS_OLD might be a good idea. (This still has nothing to do
with NPTL.) Having two is silly, and anything that's wrong with the newer
linuxthreads should be _fixed_ before NPTL goes in. Eliminating unnecessary
On Friday 26 September 2008 02:48:16 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 02:17:30AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
Removing LINUXTHREADS_OLD might be a good idea. (This still has nothing
to do with NPTL.) Having two is silly, and anything that's wrong with
the newer
Removing LINUXTHREADS_OLD might be a good idea. (This still has
nothing to do
with NPTL.) Having two is silly, and anything that's wrong with the
newer
linuxthreads should be _fixed_ before NPTL goes in. Eliminating
unnecessary
duplication is always a plus, and removing code where
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 04:49:54AM +0200, Stefan de Konink wrote:
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer schreef:
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 09:56:13AM +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
Indeed I've few pending patches to push that may be worth
including in .30 release.
I plan to roll an -rc2 during the weekend of
On Sunday 07 September 2008 17:07:15 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 09:56:13AM +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
Indeed I've few pending patches to push that may be worth
including in .30 release.
- locale supports fixes
- an optimized sh4 memcpy implementation
Rob Landley wrote:
I'm interested in finding regressions too, because I'm seriously considering
putting out a .30 of my own just so there's a known set of bugs to test
against. (Considering that nothing's been checked into the repository for
two weeks, this seems like a nice point to do
Hi Bob,
Bob Wilson wrote:
I've got a few fixes for Xtensa that I'd like to get into a .30 release.
Chris
Zankel, who is maintaining the Xtensa port, has been busy with a new project
and
asked me to help him with this. We've been waiting for Erik and then Mike to
set up svn access for
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 09:22:05AM -0700, Bob Wilson wrote:
I've got a few fixes for Xtensa that I'd like to get into a .30 release.
Chris
Zankel, who is maintaining the Xtensa port, has been busy with a new project
and
asked me to help him with this. We've been waiting for Erik and then
merge?
What is the status of the 0.9.30 release?
vapier would know, ISTR that he was the designated RM.
What are the outstanding regressions versus 0.9.29 on your arch? i386
seems to be in a good shape, AFAICS. Perhaps it would be nice to look
at the open issues in mantis and fix a couple
Rob Landley wrote:
On Wednesday 27 August 2008 05:41:14 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:32:30AM +0200, Natanael Copa wrote:
Hi,
Were there any plans for a 0.9.30 release before the NPTL merge?
What is the status of the 0.9.30 release?
vapier would know, ISTR
Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
Rob Landley wrote:
On Wednesday 27 August 2008 05:41:14 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:32:30AM +0200, Natanael Copa wrote:
Hi,
Were there any plans for a 0.9.30 release before the NPTL merge?
What is the status of the 0.9.30 release
?
What is the status of the 0.9.30 release?
vapier would know, ISTR that he was the designated RM.
What are the outstanding regressions versus 0.9.29 on your arch? i386
seems to be in a good shape, AFAICS. Perhaps it would be nice to look
at the open issues in mantis and fix a couple of them
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 09:56:13AM +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
Indeed I've few pending patches to push that may be worth
including in .30 release.
- locale supports fixes
- an optimized sh4 memcpy implementation (currently used
since a long time in uclibc-nptl, glibc and kernel)
- getdents
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer schreef:
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 09:56:13AM +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
Indeed I've few pending patches to push that may be worth
including in .30 release.
- locale supports fixes
- an optimized sh4 memcpy implementation (currently used
since a long time in
Hi,
Were there any plans for a 0.9.30 release before the NPTL merge?
What is the status of the 0.9.30 release?
Thanks!
-nc
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:32:30AM +0200, Natanael Copa wrote:
Hi,
Were there any plans for a 0.9.30 release before the NPTL merge?
What is the status of the 0.9.30 release?
vapier would know, ISTR that he was the designated RM.
What are the outstanding regressions versus 0.9.29 on your arch
18 matches
Mail list logo