Re: status of 0.9.30 release

2008-09-27 Thread Rob Landley
On Friday 26 September 2008 10:06:22 Chase Douglas wrote: Has anyone else tried to compile openssh against the new linuxthreads stack? When I tried a few weeks ago it failed to compile auth-pam.c. In that file they do some pretty wacky stuff like redefining some of the pthread functions.

Re: status of 0.9.30 release

2008-09-26 Thread Rob Landley
On Thursday 25 September 2008 16:53:24 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 04:49:54AM +0200, Stefan de Konink wrote: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer schreef: On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 09:56:13AM +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: Indeed I've few pending patches to push that may be

Re: status of 0.9.30 release

2008-09-26 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 02:17:30AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: Removing LINUXTHREADS_OLD might be a good idea. (This still has nothing to do with NPTL.) Having two is silly, and anything that's wrong with the newer linuxthreads should be _fixed_ before NPTL goes in. Eliminating unnecessary

Re: status of 0.9.30 release

2008-09-26 Thread Rob Landley
On Friday 26 September 2008 02:48:16 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 02:17:30AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: Removing LINUXTHREADS_OLD might be a good idea. (This still has nothing to do with NPTL.) Having two is silly, and anything that's wrong with the newer

Re: status of 0.9.30 release

2008-09-26 Thread Chase Douglas
Removing LINUXTHREADS_OLD might be a good idea. (This still has nothing to do with NPTL.) Having two is silly, and anything that's wrong with the newer linuxthreads should be _fixed_ before NPTL goes in. Eliminating unnecessary duplication is always a plus, and removing code where

Re: status of 0.9.30 release

2008-09-25 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 04:49:54AM +0200, Stefan de Konink wrote: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer schreef: On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 09:56:13AM +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: Indeed I've few pending patches to push that may be worth including in .30 release. I plan to roll an -rc2 during the weekend of

Re: status of 0.9.30 release

2008-09-22 Thread Rob Landley
On Sunday 07 September 2008 17:07:15 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 09:56:13AM +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: Indeed I've few pending patches to push that may be worth including in .30 release. - locale supports fixes - an optimized sh4 memcpy implementation

Re: status of 0.9.30 release

2008-09-10 Thread Bob Wilson
Rob Landley wrote: I'm interested in finding regressions too, because I'm seriously considering putting out a .30 of my own just so there's a known set of bugs to test against. (Considering that nothing's been checked into the repository for two weeks, this seems like a nice point to do

Re: status of 0.9.30 release

2008-09-10 Thread Chris Zankel
Hi Bob, Bob Wilson wrote: I've got a few fixes for Xtensa that I'd like to get into a .30 release. Chris Zankel, who is maintaining the Xtensa port, has been busy with a new project and asked me to help him with this. We've been waiting for Erik and then Mike to set up svn access for

Re: status of 0.9.30 release

2008-09-10 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 09:22:05AM -0700, Bob Wilson wrote: I've got a few fixes for Xtensa that I'd like to get into a .30 release. Chris Zankel, who is maintaining the Xtensa port, has been busy with a new project and asked me to help him with this. We've been waiting for Erik and then

Re: status of 0.9.30 release

2008-09-08 Thread Carmelo Amoroso
merge? What is the status of the 0.9.30 release? vapier would know, ISTR that he was the designated RM. What are the outstanding regressions versus 0.9.29 on your arch? i386 seems to be in a good shape, AFAICS. Perhaps it would be nice to look at the open issues in mantis and fix a couple

Re: status of 0.9.30 release

2008-09-07 Thread Carmelo Amoroso
Rob Landley wrote: On Wednesday 27 August 2008 05:41:14 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:32:30AM +0200, Natanael Copa wrote: Hi, Were there any plans for a 0.9.30 release before the NPTL merge? What is the status of the 0.9.30 release? vapier would know, ISTR

Re: status of 0.9.30 release

2008-09-07 Thread Carmelo Amoroso
Carmelo Amoroso wrote: Rob Landley wrote: On Wednesday 27 August 2008 05:41:14 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:32:30AM +0200, Natanael Copa wrote: Hi, Were there any plans for a 0.9.30 release before the NPTL merge? What is the status of the 0.9.30 release

Re: status of 0.9.30 release

2008-09-07 Thread Rob Landley
? What is the status of the 0.9.30 release? vapier would know, ISTR that he was the designated RM. What are the outstanding regressions versus 0.9.29 on your arch? i386 seems to be in a good shape, AFAICS. Perhaps it would be nice to look at the open issues in mantis and fix a couple of them

Re: status of 0.9.30 release

2008-09-07 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 09:56:13AM +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: Indeed I've few pending patches to push that may be worth including in .30 release. - locale supports fixes - an optimized sh4 memcpy implementation (currently used since a long time in uclibc-nptl, glibc and kernel) - getdents

Re: status of 0.9.30 release

2008-09-07 Thread Stefan de Konink
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer schreef: On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 09:56:13AM +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: Indeed I've few pending patches to push that may be worth including in .30 release. - locale supports fixes - an optimized sh4 memcpy implementation (currently used since a long time in

status of 0.9.30 release

2008-08-27 Thread Natanael Copa
Hi, Were there any plans for a 0.9.30 release before the NPTL merge? What is the status of the 0.9.30 release? Thanks! -nc ___ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

Re: status of 0.9.30 release

2008-08-27 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:32:30AM +0200, Natanael Copa wrote: Hi, Were there any plans for a 0.9.30 release before the NPTL merge? What is the status of the 0.9.30 release? vapier would know, ISTR that he was the designated RM. What are the outstanding regressions versus 0.9.29 on your arch