Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 January 2009 08:20, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
>> v...@uclibc.org wrote:
>>> Author: vda
>>> Date: 2009-01-04 21:19:43 + (Sun, 04 Jan 2009)
>>> New Revision: 24686
>>>
>>> Log:
>>> ldso/ldso/dl-startup.c: make _dl_elf_main static; remove one dead variable.
>>>
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 08:20, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
> v...@uclibc.org wrote:
> > Author: vda
> > Date: 2009-01-04 21:19:43 + (Sun, 04 Jan 2009)
> > New Revision: 24686
> >
> > Log:
> > ldso/ldso/dl-startup.c: make _dl_elf_main static; remove one dead variable.
> > ldso/ldso/avr32/dl-start
v...@uclibc.org wrote:
> Author: vda
> Date: 2009-01-04 21:19:43 + (Sun, 04 Jan 2009)
> New Revision: 24686
>
> Log:
> ldso/ldso/dl-startup.c: make _dl_elf_main static; remove one dead variable.
> ldso/ldso/avr32/dl-startup.h: remove superfluous definition of START() macro.
> ldso/ldso/*/dl-st
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 04:45:05PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>> So the only immediately annoying thing in ldso remains:
>> ldso/ldso/dl-elf.c: In function '_dl_load_shared_library':
>> ldso/ldso/dl-elf.c:201: warning: unused parameter 'tpnt'
>
> The solution in the gcc t
Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> So the only immediately annoying thing in ldso remains:
> ldso/ldso/dl-elf.c: In function '_dl_load_shared_library':
> ldso/ldso/dl-elf.c:201: warning: unused parameter 'tpnt'
The solution in the gcc tree is to use __attribute__((unused)) for
anything that may be unused
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 04:19:26PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> -if (!(tpnt->init_flag & RELOCS_DONE))
>> +if (!(tpnt->init_flag & RELOCS_DONE)) {
>> _dl_if_debug_dprint("relocation processing: %s\n",
>> tpnt->libname);
>> -
>> +}
>
>Seems to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - if (!(tpnt->init_flag & RELOCS_DONE))
> + if (!(tpnt->init_flag & RELOCS_DONE)) {
> _dl_if_debug_dprint("relocation processing: %s\n",
> tpnt->libname);
> -
> + }
Seems to me it would be better to fix the macro than all of its callers?
Ber
Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
> You should move the calculation of rem to within the if statement,
> since the modulo operation is time consuming and the if statement
> is marked as unlikely(), i.e.:
>
> if (unlikely((bitmask_word >> hashbit1) & (bitmask_word >>
> hashbit2) & 1)) {
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: den 9 mars 2008 08:07
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: svn commit: trunk/uClibc/ldso/ldso
>
> Author: carmelo
> Date: 2008-03-08 23:07:20 -08
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 07:06:02PM +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Saturday 12 January 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: carmelo
Date: 2008-01-12 00:20:18 -0800 (Sat, 12 Jan 2008)
Ne
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 07:06:02PM +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Saturday 12 January 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Author: carmelo
> >> Date: 2008-01-12 00:20:18 -0800 (Sat, 12 Jan 2008)
> >> New Revision: 20848
> >>
> >> Log:
> >> Make sh4 build works again add
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 12 January 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Author: carmelo
>> Date: 2008-01-12 00:20:18 -0800 (Sat, 12 Jan 2008)
>> New Revision: 20848
>>
>> Log:
>> Make sh4 build works again adding a temporary work-around
>> iby redefining __always_inline to inline until gcc
On Saturday 12 January 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: carmelo
> Date: 2008-01-12 00:20:18 -0800 (Sat, 12 Jan 2008)
> New Revision: 20848
>
> Log:
> Make sh4 build works again adding a temporary work-around
> iby redefining __always_inline to inline until gcc 4.x.x will get
> fixed.
>
> Mo
13 matches
Mail list logo
