[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/06/2008 04:43:15 PM:
> On Thursday 06 November 2008 17:53, mzhang wrote:
> > It is almost impossible to post the C/C++ code and the build system
> > because there are millions of lines of code (proprietary and open
> > source) on a commercial product.
>
> You run mill
On Thursday 06 November 2008 17:53, mzhang wrote:
> It is almost impossible to post the C/C++ code and the build system
> because there are millions of lines of code (proprietary and open
> source) on a commercial product.
You run million-lines-of-code multithreaded program on MIPS?
> That bein
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 9:09 PM, mzhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I posted the following question a while back. Since then, we found out
> that our App was accidentally compiled with the 2.4 Header files. After
> changing the build system to compile with the 2.6 kernel headers, it
> seems the pro
Hello list,
I posted the following question a while back. Since then, we found out
that our App was accidentally compiled with the 2.4 Header files. After
changing the build system to compile with the 2.6 kernel headers, it
seems the problem described below has been contained.
However, just re
On 14/08/2008, mzhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> We are migrating to Linux-2.6.10+uClibc-0.9.28.1+Busybox-1.2.2.1 on a
> mipsel embedded platform from Linux kernel 2.4 + glibc 1.x. Everything
> in our application seems working fine except the "system()" call.
>
> Our application
Hello folks,
We are migrating to Linux-2.6.10+uClibc-0.9.28.1+Busybox-1.2.2.1 on a
mipsel embedded platform from Linux kernel 2.4 + glibc 1.x. Everything
in our application seems working fine except the "system()" call.
Our application is multi-threaded and "the system()" call worked in the
ma
