Re: uClibc-0.9.33: ARM NPTL static link failure with sigprocmask vs. setjmp

2012-04-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:12:49PM +0200, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:11:41PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:34:06PM +0100, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > > >On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:00:44PM +0100, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > > >>

Re: uClibc-0.9.33: ARM NPTL static link failure with sigprocmask vs. setjmp

2012-03-27 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:11:41PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:34:06PM +0100, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > >On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:00:44PM +0100, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:11:37AM +0800, Tony Wu wrote: > >> > > >> > The s

Re: uClibc-0.9.33: ARM NPTL static link failure with sigprocmask vs. setjmp

2012-03-26 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:34:06PM +0100, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: >On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:00:44PM +0100, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:11:37AM +0800, Tony Wu wrote: >> > >> > The sigaction, sigprocmask, and sigfillset static link issue has >> > already been addres

Re: uClibc-0.9.33: ARM NPTL static link failure with sigprocmask vs. setjmp

2012-02-23 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:34:06PM +0100, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: >On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:00:44PM +0100, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:11:37AM +0800, Tony Wu wrote: >> > >> > The sigaction, sigprocmask, and sigfillset static link issue has >> > already been addres

Re: uClibc-0.9.33: ARM NPTL static link failure with sigprocmask vs. setjmp

2012-02-21 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:00:44PM +0100, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:11:37AM +0800, Tony Wu wrote: > > > > The sigaction, sigprocmask, and sigfillset static link issue has > > already been addressed in the future branch back in Apr. 2011, but the > > future branch is n

Re: uClibc-0.9.33: ARM NPTL static link failure with sigprocmask vs. setjmp

2012-02-20 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:11:37AM +0800, Tony Wu wrote: > > The sigaction, sigprocmask, and sigfillset static link issue has > already been addressed in the future branch back in Apr. 2011, but the > future branch is not merged yet. > > Until then, you can try to cherry-pick the following patche

Re: uClibc-0.9.33: ARM NPTL static link failure with sigprocmask vs. setjmp

2012-02-20 Thread Tony Wu
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > Hi, > > while my simple test cases all worked a more complicated application > fails to link.  I distilled this small test case: > > #include > #include > #include > > int main() > { >        sigset_t set; >        jmp_buf env; >  

uClibc-0.9.33: ARM NPTL static link failure with sigprocmask vs. setjmp

2012-02-20 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
Hi, while my simple test cases all worked a more complicated application fails to link. I distilled this small test case: #include #include #include int main() { sigset_t set; jmp_buf env; sigemptyset(&set); sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, &set, NULL); setjmp(e