Re: master thaw [was Re: uClibc master is frozen in preparation of 0.9.31]

2010-04-17 Thread Rob Landley
On Friday 02 April 2010 11:22:25 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: From NPTL on we will officially require a C99 compatible compiler to compile (just because the SINGLE_THREAD_P or however it's called is implemented in a distgusting way. Pity, isn't it, but heck. /me pets GCC ;) The C99 spec is

master thaw [was Re: uClibc master is frozen in preparation of 0.9.31]

2010-04-02 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 03:34:04PM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 08:41:23AM +0100, Natanael Copa wrote: On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com wrote: Hi, uClibc master is frozen in preparation of 0.9.31. That was good

Re: uClibc master is frozen in preparation of 0.9.31

2010-03-04 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 08:41:23AM +0100, Natanael Copa wrote: On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com wrote: Hi, uClibc master is frozen in preparation of 0.9.31. That was good news! Congratulations! Is NPTL planned to go in there? 0.9.31 is an

uClibc master is frozen in preparation of 0.9.31

2010-03-03 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Hi, uClibc master is frozen in preparation of 0.9.31. The only (non-documentation) changes that may be made are changes that fix bugs or add new ports which do not require changes to other parts of the library. New functionality may not be introduced during this period. Known bugs that would be

Re: uClibc master is frozen in preparation of 0.9.31

2010-03-03 Thread Natanael Copa
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com wrote: Hi, uClibc master is frozen in preparation of 0.9.31. That was good news! Congratulations! Is NPTL planned to go in there? The only (non-documentation) changes that may be made are changes that fix bugs