[uClinux-dev] Problem linking

2007-07-27 Thread Jose M. Puyal
Hi all, I'm newbie with uClinux, i'm trying to compile a sample c++ project with m68k-elf-tools and i'm having some problems linking, could someone have a look and help me please?. Thanks. I have 3 files (Test.h, Test.cc, main.cc) and i'm using an example makefile, the output i get is as

Re: [uClinux-dev] GCC Optimization

2007-07-27 Thread David McCullough
Jivin amol sukerkar lays it down ... Thanks, David! I was actually asking about both 2.4.x and 2.6.x and not for kernel but user/. Then the LOPT/UOPT or equivalent for your arch is the way to go, Kernel can depend on the kernel version and target arch and Cheers, Davidm On 7/26/07,

Re: [uClinux-dev] GCC Optimization

2007-07-27 Thread Erwin Authried
Am Freitag, den 27.07.2007, 16:05 +1000 schrieb David McCullough: Jivin amol sukerkar lays it down ... Thanks, David! I was actually asking about both 2.4.x and 2.6.x and not for kernel but user/. Then the LOPT/UOPT or equivalent for your arch is the way to go, Kernel can depend on the

Re: [uClinux-dev] [PATCH] NOMMU: Fix SYSV IPC SHM

2007-07-27 Thread David Howells
Allen Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does this patch fix the problem I mentioned in my previous emails uClinux supports shared memory IPC? No. This fixes a bug introduced by the recent fault handler revision patches from Nick Piggin. David ___

Re: [uClinux-dev] GCC Optimization

2007-07-27 Thread Jamie Lokier
David McCullough wrote: for the kernel, I seem to remember that it doesn't compile with optimization turned off, due to some macros. I think it was with the i/o instructions... Yeah, inlines don't like -O0 IIRC, something along those lines :-) I also seem to remember that most of the

Re: [uClinux-dev] GCC Optimization

2007-07-27 Thread David McCullough
Jivin Erwin Authried lays it down ... Am Freitag, den 27.07.2007, 16:05 +1000 schrieb David McCullough: Jivin amol sukerkar lays it down ... Thanks, David! I was actually asking about both 2.4.x and 2.6.x and not for kernel but user/. Then the LOPT/UOPT or equivalent for your

Re: [uClinux-dev] GCC Optimization

2007-07-27 Thread amol sukerkar
Thanks, David! I am getting desired results. On 7/27/07, David McCullough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jivin amol sukerkar lays it down ... Thanks, David! I was actually asking about both 2.4.x and 2.6.x and not for kernel but user/. Then the LOPT/UOPT or equivalent for your arch is the

RE: [uClinux-dev] Shared library issues on m68knommu and gcc 4.1.1

2007-07-27 Thread Jate Sujjavanich
My earlier understanding was incorrect. The problem (so far) is not in the GOT. It is definitely in the relocation table. After turning on verbose modes and enabling debug symbols in uClibc, etc etc I was able to compare what elf2flt and the flat format loader were doing. First, let's look at